Big try at gravity wheel

[powercat]

September 07, 2012    Your own words not unfounded accusations

Gents,

It appears to me that this discussion can not achieve anything near over-unity

Fletcher, Seamus, MT,
It looks to me looks that this discussion can never lead to anywhere good, the least over-unity,  because you guys appear so preconceived, by needing everything into the latest details presented to you and then you will dispute and be unbelieving without giving any serious counter argument.

I can appreciate a logical counter argument,  I have been trying to steer towards it but I am not getting it here.

I presented some overview and flow figures in previous postings that played out a theoretical positive over-unity scenario.  You have been given the HW measurements, flow volumes, pressures, working details and processes, these have been described all over these pages but there is nowhere any counter analysis with  figures that contradict or show the flaw that is presented.

The only thing that I see is " can never work, why who knows...."  or there are generalized arguments referring to the conservation laws and water can not flow uphill or we wait for the validation.  You starting to look naked on these pages, poor I say...

Lets advance and say that the validation reports "all is legitimate & OK & OU". What will you have then, you still wouldn't know more than you have today.  Or am I missing something ?, please enlighten me

I could finish the cycle with putting everything on the table, but this is not my place to do that, I leave that to the master of this invention

Regards, Michel

http://www.overunity.com/10596/hydro-differential-pressure-exchange-over-unity-system/msg335268/#msg335268
Like I said before you are becoming transparent, you have made enough posts for people to see your modus operandi, if anyone has the times spare, click on red_sunsets name, and look at all his previous post. 
They will see you regurgitating the same old stuff and despite many people telling you that those theories and opinions don't work that way, you belligerently continue.

[LibreEnergia]

You are looking too superficial,  you need to look way deeper, the crux is always in the little details.

So, having reduced to the machine to its most basic components the principle of operation is now to be found in the 'little details'.

Perhaps this machine is powered by an over-unity cat, perpetually chasing its tail?

[fletcher]

Well, it appears that unless someone is motivated enough & has the ability to build & video a robust demo 3 riser system [as per Webby] this bus will keep spinning its wheels - the data would need to show a complete cycle.

The reason I say that is because Mr Wayne claimed it was clear OU, so it must contain the basic principle of operation of any downstream devices, dual or otherwise, with or without extra plumbing.

[minnie]

  Webby,
          is there a drawing so that I could have a go at a build?
                        John.

[MarkE]

Actually MarkE,, there is NO evidence against it,, if the view I put forward is correct it still meets all of the usage and data collected so far by the whole of the world.

Your data either supports the extraordinary claim in which case it would not be the same as all the ordinary data we have seen in the past, or your data also shows only ordinary behavior.  Unfortunately, you seem unable to make your data available.