This patent of Steve Marks never got attention

[Qwert]

Do whatever you wish qwert, just stop spreading disinformation about what Steven Mark's name is, and which patents are his or pertain to his invention, ok?

Sorry, I can't do that. After all, nobody knows for sure if all that TPU theory known presently is not just disinformation. Until somebody make successful replication, this is not known for sure.

Everybody can spread his/her ideas on this kind, non exclusive forum. What you, Poynt are doing here or trying to imply (at least recently), is called SUPPRESSION.

[poynt99]

Sorry, I can't do that. After all, nobody knows for sure if all that TPU theory known presently is not just disinformation. Until somebody make successful replication, this is not known for sure.

Everybody can spread his/her ideas on this kind, non exclusive forum. What you, Poynt are doing here or trying to imply (at least recently), is called SUPPRESSION.

So you are going to continue spreading lies and disinformation about Steven Mark and his TPU invention? Well, let it be known that's exactly what you are doing here.

I am not suppressing anything about SM. What I AM doing is trying to ensure the facts that ARE known do not become twisted and distorted by folks such as yourself.

[Qwert]

So you are going to continue spreading lies and disinformation about Steven Mark and his TPU invention? Well, let it be known that's exactly what you are doing here.

I am not suppressing anything about SM. What I AM doing is trying to ensure the facts that ARE known do not become twisted and distorted by folks such as yourself.

How those facts ARE known? As I said before, until successful replication, there are NO KNOWN FACTS. And as I said above, what you are doing here is a form of suppression.

This way, we'll never go to any consensus. The only way to arbitrate to prevent this nonsensical quarrel, I guess, is to report to moderator or any third-party.

[poynt99]

Since you're having such difficulty in understanding, I'll spell it out one final time:

Steven Mark is the TPU inventor's name, NOT "Steven Marks".

and

Any patent that does not bear the name "Steven Mark" or "Steven D. Mark" is not a TPU patent.


Those are the facts that ARE known, although you apparently don't have all the facts.

[SeaMonkey]

As I said before, until successful replication, there are NO KNOWN FACTS

There will be no successful replication of the
device until the aspiring replicator is willing
to make the same sort of "arrangement" with
certain "entities" that S.M. made.

The source of electrical power which emanated
from the device is not in accord with any of the
known "laws" of science.

The TPU is a deception.