Magnet coil cores, demagnetization power and Lenz delay.

[ramset]

Synchro
Resume play
Your on your own.


for the record,I have not followed your interactions with Tinsel whatsoever .
Life is too short and time to important for me to take your position.[sophomoric Name calling}


I have great respect for Tinsel's integrity ,knowledge base and build skills.
He actually builds and tests ideas here !!
I personally would welcome his input on appropriate projects and in the very near future will be dedicating much time towards this very worthwhile goal.
that goal being to get OPEN SOURCE projects with  Teeth on his Menu.
besides Cheeesy Burgers.....


your loss IMO


Respectfully
Chet
PS
from what I have recently read ,if this were a more formal [contractual] Cheeseburger challenge
you would most definitely be held liable for said Cheeseburger .


Properly liable that is...


but ... T'was a mere  Cheesy bet [gentlemen s] ,not a formal Cheeseburger  Challenge...


Formal cheeseburger challenges are time consuming process's
they must be certified and witnessed by independent 3rd party's ,such 3rd party's are typically men of character and impeccable moral fiber...

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

Take a close look at this JLN test:

JLN's sliding the coil down an iron core. He gets the "Lenz Delay" at 30mm. My question to you is;
What effect would placing a magnet at the end of the core have on the distance for the DLE effect?
Would it shorten the length increase the length or have no effect on the length?

http://jnaudin.free.fr/dlenz/DLE19en.htm

The explanation is that the experiment does not evaluate what it claims.  When transferring energy or continuous power between a source and a load, the impedance matching of the source and the load determine what percentage of the available power from the source flows to the load.  Under circumstances where there is a large mismatch then the larger impedance of the two dominates.  This is the case for example with the electrical loads in your home connected to the power utility.

By moving the shorted coil around over the iron rod, JLN changes the coupling impedance and efficiency.  What he doesn't do is get is an effect where induction is delayed.  Induction delays development of force in the direction of motion, which is as I previously described, always against the direction of motion and therefore always a braking effect.

This experiment is likened by JLN to some of Thane Heins experiments as well it should.  Thane Heins has done a number of experiments where by biasing magnetic materials he reduces the BEMF / torque constants of various motors.  Driven by a fixed voltage supply and lightly loaded by only bearing friction and windage, the result is to increase the free running speed of those motors while reducing their torque at any current.  The effect is similar to what happens when one winds a motor with fewer turns of wire. 

[MarkE]

TK's just a punk!

Whether you like TK or not, he does a very good job of backing his claims with repeatable experiments.

[synchro1]

The explanation is that the experiment does not evaluate what it claims.  When transferring energy or continuous power between a source and a load, the impedance matching of the source and the load determine what percentage of the available power from the source flows to the load.  Under circumstances where there is a large mismatch then the larger impedance of the two dominates.  This is the case for example with the electrical loads in your home connected to the power utility.

By moving the shorted coil around over the iron rod, JLN changes the coupling impedance and efficiency.  What he doesn't do is get is an effect where induction is delayed.  Induction delays development of force in the direction of motion, which is as I previously described, always against the direction of motion and therefore always a braking effect.

This experiment is likened by JLN to some of Thane Heins experiments as well it should.  Thane Heins has done a number of experiments where by biasing magnetic materials he reduces the BEMF / torque constants of various motors.  Driven by a fixed voltage supply and lightly loaded by only bearing friction and windage, the result is to increase the free running speed of those motors while reducing their torque at any current.  The effect is similar to what happens when one winds a motor with fewer turns of wire.

F=MA, Force equals mass times acceleration. When the rotor speeds up the force increases.

[minnie]

   My question is: How can you delay something that has happened?
   How can you employ something which depletes your prime objective?
                           John.