Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

I don't disagree with you, obviously.... but come on, without checkable references your story about Chris Hunter is on the same footing as her claims about BP, SESOL or whoever and their testing reports and the "bursary award which was declined"... in other words, if it can't be verified by checkable outside references or documented in some manner, it really can't be admitted into evidence.

If you don't want to post a link, can you at least tell me the names she and Hunter _were_ using at the time ?

[The Boss]

You are right about checkable references, but I'm really going by memory here.   That was 10 years, or more, ago. He went by the name of AlaskaStar, and as I recall she may have been calling herself Aethervarising or something close to that at the time. She used several names. The forum was called either OUPower or Energetic Forum or Free Energy. I honestly don't remember. Some of those forums from 10 years ago no longer exist, but I'm sure the footprints are still around on the net. That was around the time that I first became aware of her and she used to post on several forums. In addition to her circuit she used spout bizarre theories about the universe well before her discovery of zipons for which she should have been awarded the Nobel Prize. I have no intention of digging up those references, so anyone reading this is free to dismiss what I say as hearsay.   ..I just cant be bothered looking for, or rehashing, her Groundhog Day posts from years ago TK, but maybe an oldtimer from those days reading this will chime in.

[TinselKoala]

I can't find anything under those aliases either (aetherevarising is how she spelled it). I did find the OUPower forum and some controversy over his claims about his electrolyzer. So it's still a foul ball, sorry. I wish I could include the Hunter story in the database but without checkable references I can't.

Meanwhile, it's clear she is reading here, but it also appears clear that she isn't doing her homework, as usual. The current paths are fully explained in my last set of videos, and the fact that the Current Viewing Shunt data is completely spurious is demonstrated unequivocally in the last one of the set.
Last one, for the moment, that is.



P-Channel mosfet? Polly Parrot, parroting big words she cannot understand, once again.

[TinselKoala]

Examining the Gate Threshold Voltage of the IRFPG50 n-channel mosfet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pnnNR85XcQ

Unfortunately, I can't tell you how an IRFPG50 P-Channel mosfet behaves... because there is no such thing.

[TinselKoala]

Ok. Let me review. I've been presenting a series of videos that "dissect" the Q2 mosfet from the complete Ainslie-Martin circuit to examine its behaviour and to try to find the "source" of Ainslie's confusion about the oscillations and the current paths in the system.

Part 1 shows that the oscillations are produced by a power (current) source that is more negative than the "zero" ground reference for the Mosfet's Source or circuit Negative Supply Rail.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rgB3WlXtU