Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie has now officially announced a new demonstration scheduled for this Sunday, August 4, 2013.

She can't resist stuffing her announcement with garbage, though.

We'll be doing a rehearsal of the demo on Saturday 03rd August - a 'dry run'.  Thereafter we'll do the demo on Sunday 04th August intended for 17.00 hours South AFrica Time which is GMT + 2. 

And thereafter - God willing - I'll no longer be working with the circuit.  Hopefully it'll be in more capable hands than my own.  I do envisage just one more demonstration required - which is to run the test in conjunction with controls.  The data for this test was submitted in our very first paper published in Quantum.  But a Professor Jandrell of Wits university - INSISTED that this evidence be removed before he would agree to publish.  Should anyone wish to familiarise themselves with his argument for this - I would recommend that you contact him directly.  He is still gainfully employed as a reviewer for Quantum and a Professor in the engineering department.  I have tried to solicit the reasons for this requirement.  But I've failed.  What I will say about this is that this exclusion of evidence is in defiance of usual requirements in publications, which, as a rule, encourage as much data in support of the claim as possible.  And it is precisely because of this rather draconian editing requirement that we are still debating the results - SOME 12 YEARS AFTER PUBLICATION.  It is my considered opinion that Professor Jandrell INTENDED to keep the results and the claim as ambiguous as possible - in order to deny the essential claim that there is a unity breach.

The reason that Jandrell INSISTED that the data be removed is that he knew it was GARBAGE. The 555 timer made an inverted duty cycle, remember? The data WAS NOT GATHERED UNDER THE CONDITIONS CLAIMED IN THE ARTICLE and he knew it.
The only people who are "still debating the results" are the Ainslie "team". Everybody else knows they are bogus.

Meanwhile - it seems that the war of attrition - as MileHigh describes it - is now coming to a close.  LONG overdue.  For some reason - best understood by himself - Bryan Little - who claims he is NOT 'ickle Pickle' or not 'ickle'... one or the other (I forget which), has fallen away from his own thread - and is busy hiding under that rock that he needs rather URGENTLY.  This to protect his GRE count from over use and 'abuse' and to keep his identity hidden from view.  Provided only that he stays there - then I think there may be room for some interesting disclosures in the near future that are NOT mindlessly contradicted with pseudo scientific nonsense - which is his particular genius.

Insulting lying ignorant troll Rosemary Ainslie. All of this is on the record and will follow you around forever. The internet never forgets. You have been soundly disproven many times, you cannot support your own claims or even reproduce your own "data" when someone is watching you to keep you honest. Both of your demonstrations illustrate your ignorance and your mendacity and your lying papers are there on Rossi's JNP blog for everyone to examine for themselves. You can insult me all you like, but you cannot refute me, and you cannot support your own claims.
In addition, many people know exactly who I am and are laughing at you out loud for your stupid idiotic claim that I am someone called "Bryan Little".

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie, you have simply got to STOP YOUR LIES about this Quantum article and the timer circuit.

The circuit IS PUBLISHED FOR ALL TO SEE and everyone who has actually built and tested it agrees with ME: it makes the exact inverted cycle that you claim. This is NOT a coincidence or a mistake, as anyone with REAL EXPERIENCE with the 555 can tell you. No "random" error or misprint would produce the EXACT INVERSE of what you claim, and the heat results you claim are easily produced using that INVERTED duty cycle. And this has been proven over and over again by everyone who has actually done the experiment. You used an inverted duty cycle of about 96 percent ON and your own published data prove this.

You can complain and insult all you like but you cannot refute me with facts. And EVERY ONE OF YOUR LYING AND INSULTING COMMENTS is going into my Permanent Record and will be made available to anyone who gives you a second glance, ever.

I am still waiting for your public apology about all the insults and claims you made over your bogus Figure 3 scopeshot-- which is another total and complete lie, as was proven to all on the 29th of June.

Refute this. You cannot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2-gokjcDQQ

[TinselKoala]

Ah.... I see that Ainslie has posted the written terms for the upcoming demonstration, along with a price/partslist of components to improve measurement accuracy. There may just barely be time to get an order delivered to SA from DigiKey, parts installed and the Saturdy rehearsal accomplished... at which point there will be some major tears and frantic scrambling in CYA mode in Cape Town!

Meanwhile she mentions that the Skype call between her, SWeir and Donovan Martin is " available, but large: 116Mb" but she neglects to say just how or where it is "available".

I interpret her saying that it is "available" to mean that it is available. At least that's what most people mean when they say something is available. So where is the link, Ainslie? Are you waiting for ME to post it? Maybe I should do it, just for the lulz.

Of course she also said the spreadsheet data from the papers was available, and of course the scopeshots from the most recent demo _should_ be available... her lame excuse about not wanting to bother poor overworked Donny just went out the window with yesterday's conference call.... so where are those scopeshots?  I laugh at Ainslie's "available".

[markdansie]

Hi TK i just had the dates and times confirmed
Not sure if i have too much more info


http://revolution-green.com/2013/07/29/self-looped-generator-rosemary-ainslie-updates/


Will post here when i get the test objectives.
Kind Regards

[TinselKoala]

Well, if they do what she "agreed to", and they have time to do a rehearsal on Saturday... then they will discover some facts that will likely prevent them from having anything to demonstrate on Sunday. So my prediction at this point is that either there will be no demonstration on Sunday, or it will not show what she has agreed to show, or it will be another unrehearsed hashup like last time.