Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[elecar]

"Respectfully Elecar"

Hypocrite.
Just like all the rest of your ilk, you cannot refute me with facts references or demonstrations of your own, so you spew your filth and insults freely, while you criticize what you cannot understand.

Would you like to discuss Ainslie and Martin's latest sets of errors and mendacity and insults, or do you just want to continue your trolling? I know the answer.

I do not wish to discuss anything, I enjoy the reading. You can try and turn it around but just go back to your reply # 75 and its plain to see you are everything I say you are.
I do not know Ainslie or any of her partners or friends. But regardless I do not think men should speak to women the way you do.
I was following your dissection of her circuit with interest, and actually agree with your findings, so I am no Ainslie fan. But your rudeness is what comes through rather than the important content. And all because you have a personal beef.
You can not deny that you decided you would turn your venom on me because you thought my reply to Mark was all about you.

Should I expect an apology ?

[TinselKoala]

Well?

Do you think women should talk to men the way she does? Accusing .99 of fudging results, insulting PW and me the way she does, just recently?

I don't care what you think of me. You cannot refute me with facts, references or demonstrations of your own, and when you focus on what you perceive to be MY insulting behaviour, I refer you to Matthew 7:3.


So you do not wish to discuss the topic of this thread but would rather focus on me. And then you complain about my "ego". I laugh at you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_rgB3WlXtU

There is not a person on this forum who has been insulted MORE than I have been. And the claims that I pursue are claims from people like Archer Quinn, MyLOW, Wayne Travis, Rosemary Ainslie and PJHardcastle, who make claims that they cannot support, perform miserable excuses for demonstrations, commit outright fraud, and level amazing degrees of insults to their critics. Anyone who has _really_ been reading up on me and my posts knows this, and also knows that I will help people who are genuinely doing real research or asking real questions, at my own expense. Will I apologize to you for your insulting and disrespecting and misrepresenting me and my efforts? Dream on.

[poynt99]

TK,

Someone's going to blow a gasket; you have no diode drawn across the MOSFET S-D.

[TinselKoala]

TK,

Someone's going to blow a gasket; you have no diode drawn across the MOSFET S-D.

If anyone blows a gasket it will be me.

Does my demonstration help to explain the negative bias issue, the current path involving Q2 or not?
Could I replace the battery and pot with a FG, or not? What will happen if I then put a "Q1" in the circuit and wire it like Ainslie has? Will I have demonstrated the feature of the circuit that Ainslie says is impossible, or not?

Does the body diode really make any difference, or not? I mean, I certainly didn't remove it from the transistor for my demonstration, did I. And many mosfet circuit symbols, like the 2n7000, don't include the body diode because _everybody knows it's there_. Don't they?

[TinselKoala]

Next: Replacing the Negative Bias 9v battery and potentiometer with a Function Generator.

Will Ickle Pickle be able to light up the light bulb without any extra batteries, just using the FG alone to stimulate the mosfet's SOURCE, leaving the Gate pinned to the battery negative and earth ground?

But the battery is "disconnected", isn't it?


(Am I moving too fast for you, Donny?)