Bedini, Lindemann, Bearden, Dollard -- What are their Accomplishments?

[Floor]

YET!

[profitis]

im not in the mood to get violent..but dont test me..

[Floor]

im not in the mood to get violent..but dont test me..

Apology

I did not enter into these "OU" forums to simply nay say, or to critique spelling or grammar or punctuation.  But then how would know this? I might be just another toll.  I'm not.

I'm not trying to "test you" or anyone else, or to stir up infighting.  My OWN emphasis in using an "!" instead of a "?" is intended to emphasis, my  determination, and the determination  of others,  to explore / find an "OU" device or exotic environmentally friendly energy sources. 

If indeed such devices already exist "?", but have been suppressed, by either infighting or powerful external forces, I'm quite sure that I don't know this to be, either true or not true.  I do agree that suppression is a possibility, even likely.   Cheers

[profitis]

gotcha @floor.the reason i emphasized the question mark is because such proposed overunities do exist and not all 'suppressed'.ive already put a bet up one of these threads that if anyone can disprove that what is known as the karpen pile isnt total in-your-face overunity then i,l put a vid of me walking in the public streets in my underwear here on this website but no takers thus far,even in theory..thats why i hate to see people say,yet! when its not true.i gues most people are not aware though so we cool floor.

[tinman]

gotcha @floor.the reason i emphasized the question mark is because such proposed overunities do exist and not all 'suppressed'.ive already put a bet up one of these threads that if anyone can disprove that what is known as the karpen pile isnt total in-your-face overunity then i,l put a vid of me walking in the public streets in my underwear here on this website but no takers thus far,even in theory..thats why i hate to see people say,yet! when its not true.i gues most people are not aware though so we cool floor.

Well i look forward to seeing that video of you strolling down the street in your underwear (no not realy)
An overunity device has a COP of 1>. So unless you or some one else has figured out how to create energy,then an overunity device cannot exist-as the energy has to come from some where. So no-the karpen pile battery is not an overunity device. I would think it more a long life thermo/chemical battery. The problem you have Profitis,is that no one has to disprove an overunity device,but more that the inventor has to prove it to be an overunity device-and this has never been done with the karpen pile battery,or any other device to date. The fact that it has been outputting a small voltage and current for 60 year's,in no way means  that it is an overunity device. The Zamboni pile battery has been operating a lot longer than that in the oxford electric bell,which was constructed in 1840. While the current output may be less,the voltage is much higher(via static charge) than the 1 volt that the karpen pile battery produces.You have temp variations throughout the day,and you have two dissimilar metals submerged in sulfuric acid-all the makeings of a battery.The fact that he used gold and platinum for the electrodes,would explain the long life of the electrods them self. It was named the "the uniform-temperature thermoelectric pile".