Gravity CAN do Work

[gyulasun]

...
I say "looks like", because it is not all hands free at the moment,  ...

Hi Webby1,

So how does it look like now?   

Gyula

[tim123]

Hi Webby,
  could you model your build in Phun? (Algodoo, I know, but it's a terrible name)

I'm on your side, I currently think gravity-power is possible, for the following reasons:

1) I think Bessler was genuine.
2) I can't believe RAR Energia would waste $X million.
3) I think Eric Laithwaite was onto something.
4) I think the programmers of this reality put 'cheat-codes' in all sorts of places.
5) Most things we're told by the GovernmentScientistChurch is the opposite of the truth.


Tim

[tim123]

I do not do "sim" work,, that is for others,, got to share the fun:)

Fair enough. Sims are no substitute for the real thing.

I read that Eric Laithwaite tried to mechanise his 'anti-gravity gyroscope' arrangement, and failed. I've wondered if it's because it requires a kind of movement that comes naturally to people, but is difficult to mechanise. When you or I lift a gyroscope, we can feel how it reacts and compensate, but to make a machine to do that - not easy.

Could you explain how your device is designed to work? What's the mechanism that should deliver the OU?

[tim123]

It sounds interesting. Good luck.

I just did a bit of research on Laithwaite, and found that he did 'crack' the gyro problem before his death, resulting in this patent for a reactionless drive:
http://www.gyroscopes.org/patents/5860317LaithwaiteDawson.pdf

'It became more exciting than ever now because I could explain the unexplainable. Gyroscopes became absolutely in accordance with Newton's laws. We were now not challenging any sacred laws at all. We were sticking strictly to the rules that everyone would approve of, but getting the same result -- a force through space without a rocket.'

'Sadly Eric Laithwaite died in 1997. His device remains in prototype form, comparable perhaps to the Wright Brother's first aircraft or Gottlieb Daimler's first automobile. '

[tinman]

Simms are an important tool,, if a sim can not duplicate what I am doing then I would assume that I am missing something.

I wouldnt go assuming that Webby,as sims are based around know factor's. As we are looking for the unknown,then i hardly think a sim would be able to replicate it correctly. They are a great tool,but they are not absolute-just as the laws that they are designed around are not absolute.
The only accurate measureing tool tool is an actual device and you-providing you know how to measure correctly. I know for fact that rotating wheels with specialy designed weight's,can create a force greater in one direction,than it dose in the other.This seems to circumvent the" every action has an equal reaction in the opposite direction. Every force used to project or move something in one direction,is suppose to create the same amount of force in the opposite direction.
An example-Take a boat in water,and inside that boat there is a motor that rotates wheels and weights. One would think that no uni directional motion could be achieved,but it can be.How is it that force can be greater in one direction,than the force it took to create it in the opposite direction?.