Smot with mutliple balls

[profitis]

infact,strictly speaking,naudin did that measurement wrong.he shouldve droppd the ball at the begin side,WITH the magnets in place,thus gotten a more true potential energy reading,the results wouldve been even BETTER,ie.greater gain in kinetic energy evident.the magnets actualy slightly help raise the ball from the ground into height A.thus you are right libre,i also dont trust naudins result as there shouldve been a even greater gain in overunity evident.

[Low-Q]

Will this work?
A Semi circle smot and mutiple arms with balls at its end.
The torque on the other balls will push one ball out of the sticky spot.
To avoid reverse torque we can add a shield at the end of the Sticky spot
I have added a picture
WIll this work? or is it flawed?

A mass with a given potential energy cannot power anything more than itself.

[profitis]

@low-q..precisely,which is why we are struck with horror when we see a magnet fling a piece-o-metal further away than it was to begin with,just doesnt add up.in other words,you are talking crap.

[Low-Q]

@low-q..precisely,which is why we are struck with horror when we see a magnet fling a piece-o-metal further away than it was to begin with,just doesnt add up.in other words,you are talking crap.

The problem is that you use energy to place the ball into the smot ramp by unattentionally fighting against magnetic repulsion while approaching the ball toward its starting point. That energy is finally pushing the ball over the edge at the end of the ramp. So the ball has already got potential energy at its starting point due to the work done by the hand which put it there. I cant help people who cannot understand this other than saying that they do not see the whole picture. Its therfor up to them figuring out where the missing energy is coming from. I have figured it out, and its up to others to disprove my findings. Good luck.

[LibreEnergia]

@low-q..precisely,which is why we are struck with horror when we see a magnet fling a piece-o-metal further away than it was to begin with,just doesnt add up.in other words,you are talking crap.

It is entirely consistent with the nature of magnetic fields and does not indicate any anomalous energy effects.
There is no requirement for the shape of a magnetic field to be either circular or even symmetrical (although it will be conformally equivalent to one of these).
Because of this a ball moving in a magnetic field from one position to another of equal magnetic POTENTIAL need end up the same DISTANCE from the magnet.

Gravitational fields are the same. The shape of gravitational field dependent on the density of the masses it contains. In the normal case, because the earth is roughly circular and of regular density we equate height with gravitational potential, but this is not strictly the case. If we were to measure the movement of an object near to a extremely dense object on earth we would also see that distance and gravitation potential energy were not linearly related.