Smot with mutliple balls

[profitis]

no @libre.the difference is perpetuum mobilum is banned with magnets due to the difficulty of repeating even some of the cycle without energy input.here the magnet relinquished its grip for an instant,allowing net gains.

[profitis]

@liberty do you have any vids of this device?

[LibreEnergia]

no @libre.the difference is perpetuum mobilum is banned with magnets due to the difficulty of repeating even some of the cycle without energy input.here the magnet relinquished its grip for an instant,allowing net gains.

I don't think there is any net gain. Those studying the magneto-caloric effect would have noticed I'm sure. All the data I've seen so far suggests it follows normal thermodynamic principles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_refrigeration and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MCE.gif summarises it quite well.

If you can prove it, I'd certainly be interested in developing it.

[profitis]

well @libre,lucky for us we can just look at naudin,s smot result meantime until we get our hands on gadolinium to chek my predictions out.naudin dropped the ball from height A at the smot entrance and height B at the smot exit and gues what,it rolled 55mm further at the exit than at the entrance.where did this gain in kinetic energy come from libre.what gave the ball this extra push away from the magnets.the magnets flung the ball further away from the magnets than it was in the first place!! Imagine the surprise.

[markdansie]

Hi
I was lucky enough to meet the guy accredited with the first Smot in 1982. There is nothing of any use there.
Mark