New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[TinselKoala]

Once again, the Brine Shrimp insists on straying off topic and posting irrelevancies that try to bury the real issues that this thread is concerned with. There is enough noise already, and SEA MONKEY IS PERFECTLY FREE to start his...or her.... own thread where the noise can be listened to by whomever.

This thread is about Rosemary Ainslie and the issues around her various demonstrations, "papers" and claims.


Now.... please take a look at the most recent set of posts. Rosemary Ainslie is seriously deluded. She claims that Mark E and the rest of us

Dear Mark,

You most certainly HAVE been advised by public companies that they are aware of the results referenced in the paper and that they stand by the claim of measured anomalies. 

If you feel that this level of accreditation does not satisfy you - then perhaps you could take the trouble to advise them.  Meanwhile I note that your opinion on this matter is at variance with my own.

Regards
Rosemary Ainslie

[/color]

Here she insists that HER OWN statements, lists of alphabet agencies and HER OWN claims about what they did, ten or twelve years ago... without any documentation at all, not even an email.... means that THE PUBLIC COMPANIES HAVE ADVISED us of their results and endorsement. Then she challenges Mark to talk to the companies!
Of course she knows that none of the referenced companies have ever heard of her nonsense. SHE CANNOT PRODUCE A SINGLE BIT OF DOCUMENTATION of her silly claims and this latter set of delusional rants from her are just further evidence of that.

How can anyone possibly have such muddled thinking? Nobody has been "advised" BY THE PUBLIC COMPANIES of anything at all concerning Ainslie! Nobody from ANY COMPANY has ever "advised" anyone concerning Ainslie!

I can show where Professor Kahn banned her from his laboratory, in Kahn's own words .... and I can show where Tektronix pulled their loaner scope because she misrepresented their involvement, in Tektronix official emails ..... But she can't show a single jot or tittle of evidence for her claims concerning ABB, BP, SASOL, or the other strings of random letters she emits. Yet she claims THE COMPANIES THEMSELVES "advised"

[/color]I know you have not been contacted.  Nor was direct contact necessary.  We have an unusual claim.  To support the evidence we sought and obtained validation of our results from experts within many different companies.  Those companies that are listed in the paper have not only accredited these results but have have also permitted their names to be published in that same paper.  Precisely to obviate the inevitable objections that we anticipated from those such as you and your colleague Tinsel Koala.  That referenced accreditation is the vehicle of information to which I refer.  Therefore, indeed, you have been notified by them of their accreditation.  If you have a quarrel with what they've approved - then take the complaint up with them.

[/color]

I am astounded once again. Just when I think that the Ainslie delusions have taken a break, she proceeds to emit even more utter and incredible bullcrap. She makes a claim about a company "accrediting" her garbage, gives no evidence at all, then turns around and tells you that the COMPANIES THEMSELVES HAVE NOTIFIED YOU of their accreditation.

But they haven't! Is there anyone, anywhere, who would take Ainslie's undocumented statements as a "notification" from the companies themselves?

Is Ainslie being honest here, or honorable? I submit to you readers, that a claim from Ainslie is not the same as a notification from a company, and it is dishonest to claim it is, and it is dishonorable to continue to pretend that her Quantum magazine article does not specify exactly the dutycycle and frequency she claims were used to make the data in the paper......because it does so specify, as Mark E. has quoted several times. I also submit to you that it is dishonorable in the extreme for her to attempt to blame someone other than herself and her co-author BC Buckley for the TOTAL CONTENTS of the article that bears their names.

[SeaMonkey]

This thread is about Rosemary Ainslie and the issues around her various demonstrations, "papers" and claims.

As you wish.  This Dead Horse has been beaten
with such vigor that it is a disjointed pile of bones.

Who knows, you may bring it back to life.

Carry on, keep on beatin'.

[MileHigh]

<<< Once you've got it pegged on what seems like a reasonable COP which WILL be greater than 1  >>>

Deja Vu!  Some people deserve prizes.

Well, when you are trained in the science of electronics and energy, you can just look at a schematic and pass judgement on it.  The Quantum circuit is obviously under unity just like the insane miss-wired MOSFET circuit was under unity.

Some people get upset when a "laying on of eyes" passes judgement on a circuit but it's not rocket science people.  A switching MOSFET is a variable resistor and will burn off more and more energy the faster it switches.  You can literally just look at a schematic and and make a rough estimate on where the supplied battery power is going to get burned off.

All of Sea Monkey's allusions to "secret sauce - ha ha seek and ye shall find" are just delusions and hope.  Or they could be connected to the Grand Conspiracy.  Same thing for Rosemary saying to find the "right" oscillation.

The Cracker Jack box is empty.  Doooooooooooooooooooommmmm!!!!!

[MileHigh]

And this is the kind of thing that drives me nuts and that's why I stay away from this sheit:

<<< here's my take.  In all the time that I tried to progress our Q-array - I NEVER got a single expert to comment on those results. >>>

You biatch, how dare you say that at this point in this game.  Poynt99, PicoWatt, myself, TK, Steve Weir, Mark E, and I am probably missing others, ARE EXPERTS you dumb insulting ass!  Some are EXTREME experts.

She can't be that dense, she knows she is lying but that knowledge is wrapped in a psychological "shell."  This has been going on for years.  It's like the response to the lying about the schematic for the Q-array circuit.  This is just a "construct" in her mind that she states in order to "maintain her equilibrium."  At various stages in her narrative, there are these Big Brother "War is Peace" short-circuits in the logic of her whole proposition/world view so she can keep herself afloat.

This "EXPERTS" construct is just a psychological "Get out of Jail free" game/dissonance contra-contradiction mechanism her psyche needs to stay sane and keep the story going.

Not for me.

[orbut 3000]

_yOu guy|s should try harder if you really want to squeeze the maximum performance out of this circuit* _gMeast is on the right track/ but still needs some more work to make it waterproof* _tHere are certain rare materials which can be used in a advantageous way if applied correctly*
_bUt of course you wouldn|t find it the way you look at this problem*