New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[SeaMonkey]

Work?  In this case that may be a little hard
to nail down.

The degree to which the circuitry can be made
to accomplish what the experimenter hopes to
make manifest is directly proportional to the
abilities of the experimenter.

Most noobies would have difficulty getting it to
work.

Those who have some experience with switching
supplies and MOSFET drivers will have a much
better chance of seeing it work.

And those who have the knowledge/experience
level of gents such as MileHigh, TK or 0.99 should
have little difficulty figuring out what to look for
and how to make the work happen.

Work = Hot Stuff!

[Farmhand]

If I may surmise gent's and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a small misunderstanding may be occurring.
I don't think SeaMonkey has stated he thinks Rosemary has shown Over Unity. Rather I think SeaMonkey
has eluded to the possibility of approaching 100% efficiency and 'possibly' a small amount more from energy release
or integration if such a "principal" is applied at it's best efficiency and with careful thought given to where
any extra energy may come from in such an "inductive heater arrangement". I know I have but I am not in
a position as yet to even begin an attempt.

But if I do try I will reveal my results to all, but as ambiguous results at best, unless I see a significant enough
amount of energy to be able to convince myself it's worth the effort. I won't make any over 100% in - out claims either.
And without that claim there is nothing much to argue about.

I'm not after a watt or two I want lots for cheap. I can light leds as much as I like already, What I can't do is run the house
without the grid input when there is no sun. Lighting a light bulb or two for free with even 50 Watts is a bit less than I would be
considering much use anyway. Though every bit would help, our time experimenting is valuable.

Cheers

Edited to add 'possibly' to first paragraph. I can't speak for him, I can only give my opinion.

..

[Farmhand]

I have a question I would very much appreciate a frank and honest answer to.

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

Remember a Qualified EE is watching you watching the experimenter so no one hides anything which I'm sure is the intention
you guys had anyway i just mentioned it so no one new could bring up checking the checkers at a later date. It's already considered
that way. 

Remember I respect you trained folks a great deal. And hope to do some formal training myself if I can manage it. I'm all for it.

It's just a curiosity question.

Cheers.

P.S. SeaMonkey, I have a bucket full of carbon rods some bars, copper coated but it peels off.  They were free too.

.....

[Tseak]

Farmhand,
This is essentially the concept of peer review. Generally it is not as simple and in practice goes through a number of iterations.

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

I am sure that I would initially be very skeptical. If it proved to be true it would be exciting. This would require very detailed checking. Even with the best of intentions errors can make it through a number of review processes. In this particular instance I would be doubly skeptical because every man and his dog and his dog's cat has claimed overunity due to the flyback spike. This process is well understood and leaves no room for the additional energy. Having said that, one must always keep an open mind to the possibility that our theory is not complete.  A breakthrough such as you describe would be revolutionary.

[conradelektro]

What would you guys actually do if by some freak of nature a person was to present a demonstration
and give full access to you guys to evaluate, while his own EE checked your work and you guys seen over 100% efficiency ?

Remember I respect you trained folks a great deal. And hope to do some formal training myself if I can manage it. I'm all for it.

Cheers.

For me it is evident that science (or in a broader view, humankind) does not know everything. But one has to study and research a lot and has to go out far along known paths to go beyond present day knowledge. It needs a lot more than some experiments at home to see and test the limits of todays technology. People claiming OU very obviously lack the most basic science knowledge.

Where are the limits of todays knowledge:

- May be there is a third atomic reaction besides fission and fusion, the famous "cold fusion" or "LENR". Unfortunately this area of research is infested by strange people, which give it a bad reputation. Research at home is probably not possible because one needs expensive tools (measuring heat output is tricky and chemical reactions can be dangerous if not done properly).

- May be there are longitudinal waves in electro-magnetism. This could open the way to a more efficient energy transmission between a radio transmitter and receiver. Nowadays induction charging has an efficiency of about 70%, this could be made better. This could be a field for home experimenters. One looks for a "Tesla miracle" but finds a very good antenna and antenna circuit.

- Electric motors and generators could be brought closer to an efficiency of 100%. This might be a field for home experimenters. One might search for OU and finds a more efficient motor or generator (Lenz-effect).

- Generating hydrogen from water or air could be made more efficient or practical. Home experiments could be dangerous and measurements are difficult, therefore better suited for a good research lab.

- Wind and water turbines (wheels, propellers) could be made more efficient. Could be possible at home. Measuring efficiency can be tricky.

- My favorites are neutrinos (exotic particles flying around in space at high speeds), dark matter (may be also exotic particles) and dark energy. May be one can convert this energies into useful energy like heat, mechanical energy (like a sail) or electricity. Probably not possible at home because it could need a very big machine. In general this is the search for a yet unknown natural energy source.

- My second favorite are solar energy, wind energy and heat from the core of the earth. Many inventions are necessary to make the exploitation of these energies more practical. Try to come up with a good way to make a roof out of solar panels. Nowadays one has to build a conventional roof and then one puts the solar panels on top. This is like partially destroying the roof because many bolts have to go through the roof to fix the solar panels, opening leaks. How could one integrate wind turbines and buildings? How to get the heat out of the earth? Lots of room for home experimenters.


My opinion about OU: the only OU mechanisms detected are super novae, black holes and possibly the big bang. You would not want that in the hands of anybody.

Greetings, Conrad