New Rosemary Ainslie Demonstration Scheduled for Sunday, 4 August 2013

[profitis]

it doesnt have to be a closed system @farmhand.if we go over 100% its a nail in the coffin for the thermo laws.just gota prove it.

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie has now announced that within 48 hours she will be posting images of her not-lost-after-all apparatus that she claims was used for the trials described in the Quantum magazine article of 2002. I will refer to this circuit and its variants as the Quantum-17 circuit, since she claimed COP>17 for that apparatus.

Since several people have once again begun some work on the _published_ circuit that bears Ainslie's name, we are looking forward to photos and demonstrations that are clear enough to actually convey some information, that can't be distorted or altered or covered up by Ainslie as she has done so many times in the past.

The title of this thread being now obsolete (for more than one reason!) I'll be starting a new thread to discuss her photographs and further claims regarding the Quantum-17 circuit and claims. If she manages to post anything to discuss, that is.

And we will not be forgetting, of course, the many person-years of prior work that have already occurred concerning that circuit and her outlandish claims.

[TinselKoala]

Well well well. The mendacious troll Ainslie has once again plastered a bunch of misrepresentations and outrageous claims on her honeypot forum.

As is typical she accuses me of saying that which I DID NOT SAY and proceeds to attack her own deluded ideas, while at the same time betraying her utter lack of understanding.

I have pointed out MANY TIMES that the PUBLISHED CIRCUIT CANNOT MAKE THE DUTY CYCLE AINSLIE CLAIMS.

NEVER ONCE have I said that the published circuit only makes 90 percent duty cycle, nor have I EVER SAID that it is not adjustable in duty cycle or frequency. Of course it is! I've demonstrated this in MANY VIDEOS THAT AINSLIE REFUSES TO WATCH IN HER ARROGANT DELIBERATE IGNORANCE.

What I have said, still say, and what is backed up by the work of Mark E and anyone else who cares to build the circuit, is that THE SCHEMATIC AINSLIE PUBLISHED UNDER HER NAME CANNOT MAKE THE DUTY CYCLE SHE HAS CLAIMED or any short ON time duty cycles.

I have no idea what her actual apparatus might have used... we know she LIES and even gets other people to LIE FOR HER about the actual schematics she uses. She either did not use the circuit claimed, or she did not use the duty cycle she claimed.... it's up to her to clear this discrepancy up. What is perfectly clear is that she DID NOT USE THE CLAIMED CIRCUIT to make the DUTY CYCLE SHE CLAIMED TO USE.

What I do know is that the schematic she published under her name cannot do what she claims it does. And it's clear from Ainslie's present posts that she is still perfectly willing to lie about me, about what other say, and about her own claims.

Note that she accuses ME of lying! But every thing I have said is not only TRUE, but I have demonstrated its truth with checkable references, demonstrations and Ainslie's own mendacious posts.

NOTE WELL: She accuses me of saying what I never said.... and she cannot provide any references for what she accuses me of... because her accusations are total lies!

[markdansie]

I have been emailed by her again, I must admit you were right I thought she would go away gracefully
Time to dust of the gloves
Mark

[Hoppy]

@ TK

You're on a hiding to nothing mate!