Energy from the Ground - Self powered generator by Barbosa and Leal

[MileHigh]

  There is more than a few of us waiting to replicate, if proper proof is shown,  and,  which can also be trusted.

Well, let's look at the attached graphic that crunches some numbers for a system where the sine wave inverter supplies 100 watts @120 VAC and the "ground" supplies 400 watts for a total of 500 watts going into a 144 ohm load.  (A 100-watt light bulb @ 120 VAC is 144 ohms.)

Well, the first thing you notice is that you have no choice but to see an increased voltage at the load.  So that would burn out the light bulb so I am substituting the light bulb with a 144 ohm resistor.

Can the battery charger withstand the increased voltage?

With your multimeter, you should be able to measure 148 VAC across the two earth ground connections!  (The little coil of the Neutral conductor wrapped around the captor loop secondary wire is NOT going to supply that voltage.  Feel free to measure there also on your replication.)

It's just totally amazing isn't it?  Not only does the ground supply "more electrons," but it is also a full fledged AC voltage source in itself, and it is perfectly synchronous with the inverter.  (If you put your thinking cap on, supplying "more electrons" does not even make sense.  The ground has to be a "synchronous AC voltage pump" that pushes electrons through the loop.)

To confirm the system is working, all that you have to do is measure a high voltage source across the two sets of grounding rods with your multimeter.  You can then measure the voltage increase across your load which would be (120 VAC + the "synchronous ground AC voltage source.")

[MileHigh]

I will attempt to coin a term, "The Housewife-iPad factor."

I worked in computer graphics 25 years ago.  A long time ago, but look at something like the iPad.  It's just a computer, a graphics subsystem, and a display.  Without ever having read about the guts inside an iPad, I still have a pretty good idea about how it works.  For me, an iPad is not just a "black box," I have a good feeling for what's inside the box.  What applied 25 years ago, still applies today.  The chips inside a graphics computer from 25 years ago are very similar to the chips inside an iPad.  The chips in the iPad and the underlying processes are just more modern.

But what about a "housewife" that never studied or read about technology?  For her, the way an iPad works is so far removed from her experience, that it is almost magic.  She hasn't the slightest clue about what's inside an iPad and she has no understanding about how the underlying software works.  For her, the only thing she knows is that it works.  She doesn't have to know how it works.  For her, the inside of the iPad is just "grey mist."  The software in the iPad is just "grey mist."  Her mind has no frame of reference for even conceptualizing about how the iPad works.

That is the Housewife-iPad factor.

And for many so-called "free energy researchers" and replicators, the Housewife-iPad factor comes into play.  It's happening for this replication.  BroMikey is seriously affected by the Housewife-iPad factor.  Even Clarence is suffering from the Housewife-iPad factor.  There is no demonstrated capability to understand or analyze this circuit.

For them it's like the blind leading the blind.  For me it's like the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot.

So, anybody that is considering doing a replication has to seriously consider all of these factors.  And even more importantly Clarence has to answer the questions.  Or just continue sleepwalking...

[MileHigh]

I got lazy on my power calculations and made a silly mistake.  Adding the hypothetical synchronous "ground" voltage source in series with the inverter voltage source increases the current, which also means that the inverter power output has to increase also.   My apologies and please see the corrected updated graphic.

[NickZ]

  @ MileHigh, TK, and All:
  Well, that's interesting, that 276 watts is coming from the "ground" or from somewhere. 
  Or, coming from the surrounding ambient, as Tesla mentions, and GOING to ground, instead???

   Here (below) is an interesting quote from my friend muDped at the Energetic forum,
with whom I fully agree with, (most of the time anyway). Except on some religious matters,
which we all are have a right to have an opinion on, and don't always need agree on, or disagree with what
we can't prove, as yet.

     muDped,
        quote:
    "Most manifestations of anomalous energy have no
Scientific explanation and in fact come from a source
which Science is unable to deal with.  Scientific
instruments are unable to measure it even though its
effects are plainly visible and often felt.

The vast majority are not ready to admit that the source
of this mysterious energy is from outside our physical realm."
                                                                     end quote. 

[MileHigh]

Scientific
instruments are unable to measure it even though its
effects are plainly visible and often felt.

The vast majority are not ready to admit that the source
of this mysterious energy is from outside our physical realm.

Yeah but the problem is that it's taken for granted that you can measure the voltage at the load.  Otherwise you may as well check into the loony bin.

If you can measure the voltage at the inverter, and you can measure the voltage at the load, then you sure as hell can measure the "free" voltage from somewhere.  You just have to use your eyes and follow the wires.

Your friend's comment is a cop out.

Meanwhile another brain-buster from Clarence:

THAT WAY each time A LOAD is placed on the output of the CAPTOR an incremental additional increase is added to the LOOP without quickly OVERHEATING IT!!!!!!

There is no "load" on the "output" of the captor.  The captor doesn't even have an output.

Just more nonsense.