Energy from the Ground - Self powered generator by Barbosa and Leal

[mscoffman]

Meanwhile, you completely ignored my second request to you to define "efficiency" when you talk about the captor.

MileHigh

Sorry for the delay on getting back to you,

Ok, my take on the efficiency of the captor. First, I wanted to show that Barbosa and Leal
are not "green warriors", if you will, because there is no way that a suburban housing
development could each house have an operable ground array captor supplying
its power. The captor is an elite power unit as it were.

Secondly, I wanted to show you, that even the transformer version of the captor is not
that efficient so a resistive version could be made to work. The is typical of a set of
devices known as a ballasted electronic circuits. Meaning the internal impedance of a
circuit is being used as an advantage towards operation of the device as a whole even
though steps were never take to reduce the devices internal impedance.

The captor has to at times step up voltage between 1 or 2 to 100 so I use those numbers
as 1 or 2 percent. The whole population of users electrons supports the a single users
captor electron adaptation adjustment. I agree that numbers are somewhat hokey
but my belief is that some kind of estimate is better than no estimate at all.

..S..MarkSCoffman

[MileHigh]

Nelson:

Some quotes from you:

i only  see a improvement not free energy

i did my own tests to months ago , is not a overunity circuit like people want

So you agree that this thing doesn't work.  What is the reason for even building it then?

In some of your posts I think you are stating that this device could act like a power factor corrector.  So what!?  There are already power factor correctors that you can purchase.

I have a comment for you about this:

A reach a 80% less consumption in inductive loads to 50% by resistive loads.

You have to learn to be scientific.  To say "50% less consumption by resistive loads" does not make any sense.  You have to discuss input and output parameters and all of your voltage, current, phase, and power in and power output measurements if you want to make sense.  Or something similar to that.

Like I already posted, the phrase, "My pulse motor is very efficient" is total bullshit because the efficiency is not being defined.

Everyone needs to learn to present data in a credible, logical, and comprehensible manner.  And that especially applies to the replicators of Clarence's version of the B&L system on the Energetic Forum.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Sorry for the delay on getting back to you,

Ok, my take on the efficiency of the captor. First, I wanted to show that Barbosa and Leal
are not "green warriors", if you will, because there is no way that a suburban housing
development could each house have an operable ground array captor supplying
its power. The captor is an elite power unit as it were.

Secondly, I wanted to show you, that even the transformer version of the captor is not
that efficient so a resistive version could be made to work. The is typical of a set of
devices known as a ballasted electronic circuits. Meaning the internal impedance of a
circuit is being used as an advantage towards operation of the device as a whole even
though steps were never take to reduce the devices internal impedance.

The captor has to at times step up voltage between 1 or 2 to 100 so I use those numbers
as 1 or 2 percent. The whole population of users electrons supports the a single users
captor electron adaptation adjustment. I agree that numbers are somewhat hokey
but my belief is that some kind of estimate is better than no estimate at all.

..S..MarkSCoffman

Well, you actually did not define efficiency at all, and I barely can make any sense of what you just posted.

We can leave it at that.

[MileHigh]

Oh well now that I see it a picture is worth a thousand words. The way i
explain it now in words is like this.

Stand the two toroids upward as shown in the diagram. Starting on the far left side of the first toroid go to the top going behind the core first and then around toward the front in the CW (Clockwise) rotation winding direction going downward to the bottom where the winding stops. This winding is approx 180 degrees of the circle.

Now moving over to the other half of this first toroid core use a 4awg
wire starting from the upper portion of the right side where no winding
is present. Going behind the core again coming back around in the CCW (Counter Clockwise) looking straight down on the standing cores.

If I sound like babbling fool I completely understand. It really does take
time to wrap your head around this. It feels good to know I do understand.

BroMikey.....  Just surrender yourself to the power of the dots.....

Repeat after me:

The power of the dots....

The power of the dots....

The power of the dots....

[nelsonrochaa]

Nelson:

Some quotes from you:

So you agree that this thing doesn't work.  What is the reason for even building it then?

In some of your posts I think you are stating that this device could act like a power factor corrector.  So what!?  There are already power factor correctors that you can purchase.

I have a comment for you about this:

You have to learn to be scientific.  To say "50% less consumption by resistive loads" does not make any sense.  You have to discuss input and output parameters and all of your voltage, current, phase, and power in and power output measurements if you want to make sense.  Or something similar to that.

Like I already posted, the phrase, "My pulse motor is very efficient" is total bullshit because the efficiency is not being defined.

Everyone needs to learn to present data in a credible, logical, and comprehensible manner.  And that especially applies to the replicators of Clarence's version of the B&L system on the Energetic Forum.

MileHigh

Lol You are the Guy !  The only person that you heard that do not work, it was you!
Does not give me the words that did not.
I not support what you say. end of story
You think I'll waste my time explaining whatever it is and try to be scientific to you? lol Why do it with you ? 
Do not even have a constructive discourse, moreover have nothing to prove to you.
I have proven who had to prove now is  time to continue.
Please let the topic run PLEASE!