Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[MarkE]

TinselKoala that's a possibility.  These latest missives could be explained by such a hypothesis.  You may not be feeling particularly merciful for reasons that are easy to understand.  But, if we are dealing with someone who is struggling with memory and cognitive issues, mercy may be the best course.

[TinselKoala]

When Ainslie stops lying about me and misrepresenting my work, perhaps I'll agree that she deserves mercy. But as long as she continues to emit the amazing series of falsehoods as exemplified by her latest postings, she deserves only mockery and ridicule. Just look at her latest! Not only does she completely ignore what she is being shown and told, she has to lie about it as well !!

Of course I've replicated "her" circuits.... EVERY ONE OF THEM, even the ones she herself lied about using when she never did actually use them. I've demonstrated my replications and I've even offered, time and time again, for my Tar Baby replication to be tested ALONGSIDE HER APPARATUS by any competent third party, whose judgement I will gladly accept as to whether or not Tar Baby is an exact replication. This kind of direct challenge makes Ainslie turn pale and grow faint.

And of course the scopeshot in Test 4, Figure 8 is a lot of garbage, from someone who does not know how to use an oscilloscope to display data. And OF COURSE it is easy for anyone to replicate. What does she think, two circuits built with the same components according to the same schematic will perform differently in Texas than in South Africa? I laugh out loud at Ainslie's flailing about and her abject lies, and I absolutely GUFFAW at her claims about that scopeshot. The currents that pass through the Function Generator have been measured MANY TIMES by me, by Poynt99 and even by Ainslie herself, but Ainslie has apparently forgotten that most of the amplitude in her CSR oscillations is spurious.

Note that Ainslie cannot even describe accurately what the signals are and what they mean for that Figure 8 scopeshot. Note that she states that the FG is set to produce a 20  ms period, and that she claims to be showing the switching transitions. But the scope is set to 500 microseconds per division! The ENTIRE SCREEN only contains 5 ms of data.... it does NOT show the switching transitions at all, only aliased combs of a block of oscillations lasting much longer than the screen display. Further... these oscillations are happening because the FG is supplying a NEGATIVE voltage to the Q2 SOURCE/Q1 GATE, not what she claims in her post. The Q2 Gate signal voltage is never "positive" in her circuit, it is always connected to the battery negative through the CSR and so cannot vary more than a few milliVolts from the zero reference. The Q2s are turned on by LOWERING THE SOURCE voltage to a more negative value than the zero reference voltage at the Gate.

And furthermore... the Current Probe does not even need to be hooked up to ANYTHING for large oscillations to be indicated on that channel !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C72jwywsz3w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-wy8w9MWJY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tReHHljgdjQ

[TinselKoala]

.   NO REFERENCE TO THE ADDENDUM THAT EXPLAINS THE REQUIRED PATH FOR THE FLOW OF CURRENT

No reference to Ainslie's silly counterfactual "addendum" to the rejected and completely falsified manuscript is necessary, as everyone knows where to find it.. .and where it rightfully belongs. Why should anyone reference an "explanation" that Ainslie continues to repeat every chance she gets, without it ever making any sense?

.   NO REFERENCE TO THE POST THAT YOU'RE CHALLENGED TO COPY IN FULL

FALSE. The entire post is imaged IN FULL, so that Ainslie cannot edit and change its meaning.

.   CONTINUED INSISTENCE THAT WE ACKNOWLEDGE 3 WATTS DISSIPATED IN DEFIANCE OF THE EVIDENCE

The EVIDENCE is clear: no more than 3 Watts were dissipated, and it is Ainslie who is in continual DEFIANCE of the evidence... her OWN evidence, to boot.

.   NO COGENT EXPLANATION FOR THE PATH OF CURRENT FLOW DURING THE 'OFF' PERIOD OF THE DUTY CYCLE

Utterly and ridiculously FALSE !! The full explanation has been given MANY TIMES, dissected into its simplest components and demonstrated, step-by-step, in terms even a bright eighth-grader could understand. Of course.... the explanation has to be READ and WATCHED and FOLLOWED in order for it to be understood. Ainslie is in the position of denying that the Eiffel Tower exists, because she cannot see it from her back porch.

.   YOU STILL HIDE BEHIND A MONIKER BECAUSE YOU DARE NOT DISCLOSE YOUR IDENTITY IN THE FACE OF THAT UNSCIENTIFIC NONSENSE

The only nonsense here comes from Ainslie, and it's pseudoscientific misconduct and nonsense of the very worst kind, because she is impervious to facts and logical reasoning. If she wants to have her name and personal details spread all across the world for anyone to see... that is certainly her prerogative... and perhaps she has already reaped some of the fruits of her actions. Others may not be so willing to expose themselves to madwomen who lie and threaten instead of reason, who carry on email and telephone campaigns seeking to denigrate those who criticize her. Nevertheless, there are plenty of people who know exactly who I am and where I live... I'm supposed to be Bryan Little, aren't I, living in Tennessee somewhere, or being a senior student at UT somewhere. Right? GUFFAW.... Ainslie is such a comedian.

[orbut 3000]

TinselKoala that's a possibility.  These latest missives could be explained by such a hypothesis.  You may not be feeling particularly merciful for reasons that are easy to understand.  But, if we are dealing with someone who is struggling with memory and cognitive issues, mercy may be the best course.

++


(Even if she's only a very sadistic troll persona - this seems to be the most rational approach)

[MarkE]

TinselKoala, the missives from Ms. Ainslie are very far out of touch with reality for all the reasons that you state.  Anyone can watch the videos, see the evidence and decide what it means.  Ms. Ainslie is proclaiming things that are at complete odds with what the videos obviously show including her own declarations recorded by those videos.  I think the reason that she rails against her own evidence is that she does not have the capacity to comprehend it.  I think she is quite oblivious to what she is doing to herself right now.  I think that the enemy you are battling is an empty shell.