Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[profitis]

i dont think thats a correct analysis doctor E.looking from the outside in i think ainslie intuitively knows that a kelvin breach is very very possible and that its just within her sights.i think both she and gmeast may nail it down sooner or later,if not already.

[TinselKoala]

Profitis, I really don't think you have the background in the Ainslie phenomenon to be able to judge what she "has" and what she hasn't. I am not talking about "maybes" or probabilities, I am talking about the errors, lies, insults, disrespect, ignorance and mendacity that Ainslie has emitted over the years and continues to emit, undamped and undeterred by proven fact. The way she has been acting and her precious, seriously-defended ignorance shouted from the rooftops can only HURT whatever chances (identically zero as far as I am concerned) there may be for anything of real interest to come out of her rantings and blind tinkering.

MarkE, everybody dies, everybody is sick and everybody has personal tragedies. These things have no role in the advancement of Science, except by Max Planck's "one funeral at a time." If Ainslie is tragically ill, in a mental decline, where are her keepers? Why is she allowed to persist in this utter waste of her precious time, instead of participating in therapeutic activities? Never mind, these are rhetorical questions. If I told you about my own personal illnesses and mental problems, would this make any difference as to how a mosfet behaves? Of course not. Would it make your heart bleed for me in sympathy? Maybe, but that would be irrelevant to the evaluation of claims I might make along the way.

[profitis]

Sure @tk. I may not be electrogenius enough to determine wether she does have something or not but im genius enough to know that she CAN have something.switching magnetic domains in an pulsed element can theoreticly give a window to intake extra heat from the environment than was shoved into the environment from the batteries(im willing to battle you on this issue if your up for it) so she may or may not cut into that window but i dont see how her 'shouting' or 'ranting' can hurt any final demo result any more than doctor E,s diagnosis can.as you say a mosfet stays a mosfet.

[MarkE]

Profitis, Ms. Ainslie has refuted her own claims in public demonstrations she has conducted.  She has never claimed against the Second Law of Energy.

[TinselKoala]

Sure @tk. I may not be electrogenius enough to determine wether she does have something or not but im genius enough to know that she CAN have something.switching magnetic domains in an pulsed element can theoreticly give a window to intake extra heat from the environment than was shoved into the environment from the batteries(im willing to battle you on this issue if your up for it) so she may or may not cut into that window but i dont see how her 'shouting' or 'ranting' can hurt any final demo result any more than doctor E,s diagnosis can.as you say a mosfet stays a mosfet.

Ainslie's problem personality has been _actively detrimental_ to the exploration of any postulated effects of the kind she, and you, are talking about. Her insistence on spouting her incorrect interpretations and her absolute abject ignorance of her topic both keep the conversation and the experimental work focussed on attempts to correct her errors, to gather valid data about her experimental paradigm, and to educate her out of her abysmal ignorance, rather than forging ahead in directions properly emerging from good research. To his credit, GMeast has mostly avoided falling into this trap. His initial contact with this work consisted of "replicating" her claims, but he wisely rejected the 5-mosfet design out of hand and when he started work on the single mosfet COP>17 work he quickly found out that there were enough problems with Ainslie's reporting that he quickly dropped any attempt to perform a "replication" of Ainslie's claims, and went on to explore the basic idea of pulsed mosfet switching to see if there really might be something there. To the extent that he has made progress, it is because he ignores the ridiculous rants and impossible claims and bogus circuit analyses coming from Ainslie. His finding that the Quantum article's schematic "does not work" is legendary.

Once again I will say it. What is known about the circuit Ainslie is working with is known because of the excellent experimentation and analysis by her detractors and FORMER collaborators. Ainslie herself has contributed nothing of substance, other than easy targets for debunking.