Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

depends how one looks at it @tk. i can at least declare with totalitarian certainty that she,you,or anyone playing with electromagnetic circuitry is 1)going to have to violate kelvin rule to be successful and 2)going to have to violate kelvin rule via the cyclic flipping of magnetic domains somewhere in the circuit to be successful.thus i think i am expanding on the science,at least for overunity-hunters,by zooming in on what must happen for success.no fancy math required for this statement.

So you have a "theory" that you believe with "totalitarian certainty." Fine, let's see you provide some EVIDENCE that supports your theory. The rest of your statement is irrelevant to the issue of Ainslie's incompetency and lack of relevant knowledge.

As has been suggested to you SEVERAL TIMES, why don't YOU OPEN YOUR OWN THREAD and discuss your various theories there?
I know why....

And mathematics is not a matter of viewpoint. It is either correct, or it is not. Ainslie's math is incorrect far more often than it is correct, and her conclusions are based on the incorrect maths, as I have shown many times before. This is not a matter of attitude or opinion, it is FACT.

[profitis]

precision math is definitely going to be required for power measurements i agree yes @tk

[MarkE]

Profitis Ms. Ainslie does not discuss the Second Law in any of her publications.  Ms. Ainslie's claims surround an idea of hers that when subjected to certain electromagnetic stimulus, ordinary devices such as resistors decompose releasing electromagnetic energy. 

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=14fcce9b0ebfb3a268a454e4d5f0deee&action=paper1
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?action=paper2
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?action=paper3
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?action=paper4
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?action=paper5
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php?action=paper6

[TinselKoala]

precision math is definitely going to be required for power measurements i agree yes @tk

When Ainslie's "calculations" are more than an order of magnitude "out" as they usually are .... precision math is not needed. Just accurate math is enough. Ainslie's calculation errors have led her to the exact opposite conclusion from that which should be drawn from the data. This is not a matter of "precision", it is a matter of accuracy, error checking, and her utter ignorance of basic algebra.

When one's calculations are proven to be wrong, by many people, and one refuses thereafter to correct them, or the conclusions drawn from the incorrect results, and one continues to make the same kinds of errors over and over.... this is not an issue of "precision".

[MileHigh]

What Rosemary needs is a Disney-like cartoon animation that shows how the circuit works, step by step with a top view of little "current sheep" moving along pathways being stopped and permitted to go forward by farm gates and stuff like that.  When the little current sheep enter the "load resistor trough" their wool is sheared off by "load resistor Munchkins."  Then, like magic, when the sheepies enter the "battery corral" they are permitted to graze and grow their wool back.  Then the little sheepies start their movement along the pathways being stopped and permitted to go forward by the farm gates, and so on.

A nice 15-minute Disney animation with nice pleasant narration and little sheepies going around in circles growing wool, and having it sheared off, growing wool and having it sheared off.  Step by step and then a few minutes of watching the sheepies do the circuit might do the trick.

Rosie might then understand the circuit.  Her "window of understanding" will only last a few hours and after that you will be back to square one.

So, without Disney or Pixar you are SOL.

MileHigh