Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Just for the record, here's her latest nocturnal emission.

Note how she insults and lies. Note how she has forgotten that her setup that was used for her Figure 8 did NOT include any non-inductive resistors. Note how long her interbattery and main supply wiring is for those old experiments. Note that she lies when she says that I have specifically criticized the Figure 8 shot before this. Note how she mocks the GRE without even knowing what it is, or having ever taken a standardized achievement test in her life. Note how she still falsely believes that the amplitudes of the oscillations represent actual currents, and note how she still ignores the proofs, published months and years ago, that she has been whining about lately. Note her flailing about, like a landed fish, gasping and choking in an atmosphere she cannot hope to breathe. Note her abject and total ignorance of facts and her total inability to comprehend simple explanations. Note her willfull ignorance of the fact that I have repeated her bad data all down the line, demonstrating how it is obtained, since 2009, complete with replications of every different scope trace, including amplitudes, that she has ever produced. Note her inability to process the fact that her own demonstrations have already demolished her silly "thesis", and no amount of her delusional ranting can affect the Steve Weir demonstrations and analyses-- even though she now seeks to obscure and hide the GOOD data that Steve had them produce.

Finally... note the fact that I hold her in utter contempt, since she is so dishonest that she cannot even admit to herself that she is utterly and totally wrong, her lies have been exposed for what they are,  and she has wasted all this time, all these years of her life chasing imaginary zipons, playing at her pseudoscientific misconduct.

[MarkE]

Ms. Ainslie routinely says things that are absolutely false.  How much of it she realizes and how much is delusion built on faulty memory and/or other possible cognitive limitations is not something that I cannot readily estimate.  The fantasies that she has concocted surrounding last year's demonstrations and her withdrawal of her retraction is a bit mind boggling.  This latest bit seems to imply that she doesn't realize the inductance that her long lead wires have or the resulting impacts on her fixture and measurements.  It doesn't matter because her demonstrations put those effects on display for all to see.  That she rails against what she herself showed isn't doing her any good.

I'll talk to Steve and see if I can get more details about what happened with the USB stick.

[TinselKoala]

The USB stick isn't important except as proof that they are trying to suppress data. I have made screenshots from the demo videos at the moments that Steve had them do their saves, and they are of sufficient resolution to see what is happening, even though the "numbers in boxes" cannot be read off the images. The trace amplitudes and waveforms are clear enough, and coupled with the narration in the demo recordings the facts of the matter are perfectly clear.

A much better use of the "Steve Weir" connection and Steve's valuable time, in my opinion, would be for Steve to give Ainslie a true and correct critique of the videos in my Negative Bias playlist. To have him go through those videos with Ainslie, totalling just over one hour (less than a fourth of the time of Ainslie's miserable demonstrations that we all watched carefully several times -- in fact less time than the DEAD AIR in Ainslie's demonstrations), just might... just barely might... cause Ainslie to step back and consider her position carefully.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8hSDVrRWjmJ2WxgzRvMt7V

But more likely it would turn her against Steve, just as sound criticism has always turned her against her critics. Her vitriol and her venomous petty disrespect and insults would be unleashed against him, too. I really wouldn't want that to happen.... but if it does it will be more than just a "final coffin nail"... it will be tossing another spadeful of earth over the stinking pile of decaying garbage that is her "thesis" and her "experiment".

[MarkE]

I think that Steve has watched several of your videos and left comments, though maybe not on these particular ones.  Ms. Ainslie denies what is in plain sight, and that she previously acknowledged she saw in her own demonstrations.  Since she doesn't believe herself, I think it would be imposing on Steve to ask him to try and persuade her of the reality that she denies. 

On another note she doesn't like the new book series.  She calls it facile and infantile while complaining that she complains that it contains too many acronyms.

[TinselKoala]

Notice that the idiot Ainslie wants ME to do something that SHE has NEVER DONE, and in fact is irrelevant to the issues at hand. What part of "replication" does this woman fail to understand? Never mind, that's a rhetorical question, since it's clear that she understands nothing of the process, at all, and the more idiotic rants she emits, the clearer it is to the onlookers.

She dare not repeat for herself the demonstrations I have presented in the Negative Bias playlist. She doesn't have the skill or knowledge even to put together those simple demonstrations, so maybe she could get her minion Donny to do it for her. And maybe pigs with wings can fly, too.

Too many acronyms? Are we speaking in a language that Ainslie doesn't comprehend, again? The common language of electronics and mathematics? Yes, that is clearly over her head. One would think that the deluded old woman doesn't have a computer with the ability to query Google about something she doesn't understand. Well, we have noted this deficiency of hers before, like when she says Wiki says one thing, but the actual Wiki says the exact opposite.

Ainslie disgusts me. She's not deserving of sympathy or tolerance for her mounting dementia, since she cannot restrain herself from emitting the childish insults and lies that fill up her forum posts. Someone who has had their errors pointed out many times, by many different people, for many years, but who still refuses to pick up a book and learn her topic, is deserving of contempt and nothing more.