Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

I see that Ainslie and Poynt99 are having trouble agreeing on the FACTS of the matter concerning the FG's role in completing the circuit for the Q2s during oscillation.

It is trivially easy to disprove Ainslie's ridiculous contention that the Q2s are "disconnected" during the "off" or oscillating portion of the waveform. All one needs to do is to do what I did in my videos: Build the circuit so that the SOURCES of the Q2s can be physically actually disconnected from the FG.

After all, if they are "disconnected" by the circuit operation, then surely actually CUTTING THE WIRE can't make any difference.  But it does. No oscillations are possible unless the Sources of the Q2s ARE CONNECTED to the FG, because the FG provides the necessary bias current AND the completed pathway to the battery negative.


Can you make oscillations now, silly ignorant Ainslie? Of course you CANNOT.  The only alteration in the circuit is that the Q2s are now ACTUALLY disconnected from the ACTUAL path through the FG.

So I'd just love to hear why the wire needs to be connected even though you claim in your utter ignorance that the transistors are disconnected. What is that wire doing, then, if not passing current THROUGH the FG?

Flail and whine, chatter and bloviate and flail, Ainslie ..... this simple test demolishes your crazy ideas YET AGAIN.

[MarkE]

If you can bring yourself to sit through a portion of the August 11, demonstration from about 49:30 to 51:30, that's where Steve had them adjust the function generator offset voltage demonstrating as one of your videos did that the function generator offset changes the loop current and power contributed by the function generator.  Around 51:20, Ms. Ainslie declared her agreement with Steve's explanation.  Of course now, she insists that explanation is invalid.  Will she find the courage to disconnect the Q2 source wires as you suggest??  What will happen to the function generator red lead voltage if she does??  All she has to do is unclip the four Q2 source clips.

[TinselKoala]

Yes, it's hilarious isn't it. Ainslie is not only a liar and a fool, but she is also a hypocrite.

If there was ever any doubt that there is something severely wrong with Ainslie's mind, here is the proof.

[MarkE]

Ms. Ainslie is on quite a roll.  Has she completely forgotten that during the June 29 demonstration that they showed how they got Figures: 3, 6, and 7, by misconnecting the Channel 1 scope probe?  Their current sense was a 6" length of solid wire, not the four one Ohm current sense resistors.  She and her collaborators did not connect the Channel 1 scope probe across the resistors.  That's why the current sense trace was flat at zero in Figure 3.  Ms. Ainslie is insisting that she measured 14App during the oscillation phase.  What she measured was the AC current that passed through the MOSFET parasitic capacitance superimposed on the inductive impedance of the wiring.

[TinselKoala]

If you can bring yourself to sit through a portion of the August 11, demonstration from about 49:30 to 51:30, that's where Steve had them adjust the function generator offset voltage demonstrating as one of your videos did that the function generator offset changes the loop current and power contributed by the function generator.  Around 51:20, Ms. Ainslie declared her agreement with Steve's explanation.  Of course now, she insists that explanation is invalid.  Will she find the courage to disconnect the Q2 source wires as you suggest? ?  What will happen to the function generator red lead voltage if she does? ?  All she has to do is unclip the four Q2 source clips.

Going through that miserable trainwreck again is literally painful. But I've excerpted the portion you have flagged. It's processing now and will be uploaded in a little while. This portion is amazing indeed. I do believe a couple of eighth-graders would have done a better job cooperating with Steve Weir in making their instrument settings, readings, and general videography. The part where Steve is trying to get them just to change the FG offset without fiddling with other things is like chewing on sand. To think that Ainslie is critical of MY videos... what a hoot! Without Steve's contribution and that of Poynt99, there would be nothing at all of value in that mess of knobtwisting and fiddling about. I will make the point again: All valid data on Ainslie's circuit and her outlandish claims comes NOT from Ainslie and her "team" but rather from her detractors and critics, who actually know what they are doing and how to interpret what they see on an oscilloscope. Ainslie cannot interpret a scope trace, and I doubt if Martin can either, since he spent well over five minutes trying to read a frequency of a sinusoidal waveform. If there aren't numbers in boxes for them to read, they are lost.

Will she do the simple experiment I posted above? No, of course she will not. She will not do anything that has the possibility of proving her wrong. She will emit excuses, like she doesn't have the apparatus set up any more, she doesn't want to bother Donovan, she can't tell whoever has the apparatus to do it, whatever. Even if she does, which I seriously doubt, she will engage in some hand-waving posthockery involving entities not in evidence, like zipons or truants or magnetic monopoles or something. Meanwhile she'll continue to shout and rave her strawman "challenge", trying to get me and Poynt99 to hook up a genuine 275 volt source to the outputs of our FGs.

I'll post the link to the excerpt once it's ready.