Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[MileHigh]

Siege of Leningrad TK, Siege of Leningrad....   Sigh....

(Great music, I hope that you have real speakers connected to your prime Ubuntu box... Turn it up LOUD.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T500ecHP3pE

[TinselKoala]

Yes, I've got good speakers, 5.1 system and my head is at the focus when I'm at the keyboard. Nice battle music!


Now... since we still appear to be joking around....

The image below shows the latest incarnation of the TKQ17 apparatus.  This is of course a "testbed" for the claims made by Rosemary Ainslie in and around the article published in Quantum magazine, October 2002 issue.

We have of course, long ago, already determined that the 555 timer circuit produces a flipped or inverted duty cycle that cannot operate at the duty cycle range claimed in the article. HOWEVER, in spite of all the ridiculous and varied modifications that people tried in 2009, to get a real 3.7 percent ON at 2.4 kHz setting from the 555 timer... changing components, adding transistors, all of that.... I have implemented a much easier way to do it. All that is needed is the ORIGINAL Quantum circuit, with the exact component values listed in the schematic ... and a simple Double Pole Double Throw switch.

The original Quantum circuit shows the 555 timer powered by its own individual 12-volt battery supply. Great! This fact makes my "Secret of DPDT" solution workable and easy to implement.

What the switch does is to flip the polarity of the output connections of the 555 timer section to the power section. In the Original hookup (A), the switch routes the Gate Pot input to the Pin 3 output of the 555, and the Source of the mosfet to the Negative Rail of the 555 section. In the TKFlipped mode (B), the switch is flipped and now the Gate Pot input is routed to the +POSITIVE RAIL+ of the 555 section and the Source of the mosfet goes to the Pin 3 output of the 555.

This actually works great as long as you remember that the power supplies must be separate. It takes the original timer output and flips it, so that you now get the correct very short ON times and the correct frequency range.

The DPDT switch can be seen in the image of the test apparatus below. However... it isn't being used in the photo! I have disconnected the timer section entirely and am pulsing the gate of the mosfet with the DP101 pulse generator, which can be adjusted into the "Glen" range of 50 percent HI at 450 kHz, if necessary, or to produce a truly short ON pulse at whatever frequency is needed up to about 10 MHz. The unit has a risetime of 5 ns when properly terminated... and I am using a 50 ohm BNC jumper and a 50 ohm cable terminator at the gate end of the cable.

I am here revealing the Secret of DPDT. Do not misuse it, it is extremely powerful mojo, capable of instantly reversing the strongest DC polarities in a snap. It can be dangerous if abused....

[Magluvin]

Just a swift Little note here: Rosemary Ainslie, the Red Queen of Trolls, has posted a couple more rants in her honeypot: Now, in addition to making rant-posts savaging me, MileHigh and Poynt99, she goes off on Magluvin and then Pirate!

Lol. How long ago has it been since I have even posted anything that has to do with her?

All because Poynt made a comment with Pirates name and mine?

See folks, this is what to expect when you get involved with her.  Posters beware


Well, all I have to say is, her circuit doesnt work as claimed and she proved it to herself, after many have proved it first.    Nuff said. 

Mags

[TinselKoala]

Enough said for _you_ maybe.... but certainly not enough for LMM.

Meanwhile, I hope that Aaron and gadh and some of the other earnest replicators from 2009 and 2010 are paying attention. It was pretty comical back then to see them going through all their travails in order to get something like Ainslie's original circuit to do something like what she claimed it could do... different component substitutions, even resorting to additional transistors in some cases.

But all they had to do was to use the exact schematic Ainslie published, only install the Secret of DPDT. A two dollar part, no calculations or component subs needed _at all_ in order to attain the specified duty cycle.

Of course Glen finally got his best results using two hundred times the frequency that Ainslie specified, simulating "oscillations" by simply driving the thing faster than the mosfet could keep up. But for those who wanted to try the short ON duty cycle and frequency Ainslie claimed.... sigh.

[Pirate88179]

Here is a quote from Rose on her forum about me:

"Pirate Bill is a different kettle of fish.  And he likes his fish cooked 'under unity'.  He sort of took control of a thread that mushroomed into the size of Asia and that struggled through hundreds of thousands of posts re-iterating a relatively useless possible application of under unity.  But that re-iteration became as repetitive as wind and - like wind - it regurgitated way too much acid.  That too became rankly offensive.  Thankfully the thread eventually became SO bloated it simply sank under the the full weight of his outraged pronouncements.  They had NEVER - repeat NEVER, EVER - ACHIEVED OVER UNITY.  Which was sad.  I suspect that without his STRONG and allegedly HONEST leadership - that study may well have broken loose from his agenda and born fruit.  So he served their cause WELL.  And being unusually and uncharacteristically articulate - albeit also somewhat one-dimensional - he was well able to REPEAT that UNDER UNITY CLAIM - ad nausea.   His use to the team now is to support the proclamations of ickle pickle that he too has now 'WIZED UP'.  He is only latterly, but thankfully, and NOW - very well aware of that nefarious agenda promulgated by Ainslie.  Or.  As our 'ickle pickle' puts it AINS...LIE.  And that courtesy the hard work of our Little pickle.  And not only is HONEST BILL the PIRATE a staunch supporter of UNDER UNITY CLAIMS - but he also, latterly sports a sense of humour.  NOTHING fires this up more than TK's genius at plagiarism in CLAIMING the Miss Mosfet moniker for ainslie.  He laughs to the point of choking.  He spills his coffee on his keyboard.  All that FUN.  Those fun videos where the MOSFET is bonked by the PENGUIN.  Those hideous old men on a dying thread who drooled into their laps - all those insinuations - all that JOKE poked at the zipon - all that disgusting reference - SUCH FUN.  It should be written in the annals of HISTORY - for TK's excessively brilliant reach at humour.  INDEED.  Pirate Bill is everything that can be considered TYPICAL and, as Poynty Point calls it - HONEST.   But in some way and with some obscure use of the term honest that Poynty Point is yet to define.  Frankly I think that Pirate Bill is just another little gangster - who is over paid for his hard work at denying over unity evidence.  And Pirate Bill REALLY gets it off on a group bang - especially when it's aimed at MOSFETS.  I just hope he replaces that keyboard.  Ideally with a new persona to operate it."

What the heck is she talking about?  What did I do to deserve this "honor"?  All of the work I have done and posted about has been under unity.  So has hers but, at least I admit this.  I have never claimed overunity on any device or experiment that I have done and posted about.  What topic did I "take control of"?  I believe that I hold the record for the number of views on 2 topics here that I started on this forum.  So what?  I did not take control over any topic.  Nor did I ever claim overunity for any device that I have been experimenting with.

Rose is delusional.  I have done nothing to deserve this drubbing but, I guess that does not matter to her.  I will just chalk this up to Little Miss Mosfet strikes again.  At least I am in good company.

Thanks Rose.  No need to thank me for sticking up for you before I knew what you were about.

Bill