Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Here's an example of how Ainslie's belief system causes her to emit silly claim after ridiculous claim. Do check out the videos she has linked in the posts imaged below:

http://www.overunity.com/14071/simple-overunity-electricity/msg378493/#msg378493
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP7yOFIHJPA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3qF9E_fWCQ


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

She also claims that they will be able to produce the continuous oscillations using the main batteries alone:

THEN.  We'll be redoing our Q-array tests with ESPECIAL emphasis on Test 3 paper 1.  But this time we propose to apply a continual negative signal to Q1 - to induce a perpetual oscillation.  We'll be driving the switch from the same battery supply that powers the resistor.  Here we predict a CONSIDERABLE gain to standard application.  But we'll need to rethink our heat measurements as the applied wattage will be minimal.  That will be the final VINDICATION.

Perhaps she means Q2, but who really knows. If she's talking about "perpetual", that is, continuous Q2 oscillations... once again she will be attempting to replicate work that I did, in 2012 and 2013.  The negative bias supply must come from a source that is _more negative_ than the "same battery supply that powers the resistor". Of course, since Ainslie cannot fathom how a mosfet could be turned on by _lowering source voltage_ while the Gate is pinned to Zero volts, she can't see the difficulties in her proposed operation.

Here's the playlist, AGAIN, where I explain the configuration, how the Q2 mosfets are turned on by lowering the source voltage (that is, applying a "negative signal to Q1 - to induce a perpetual oscillation." The playlist takes the viewer through the entire sequence, breaking it down into the simplest component parts, illustrating each tiny step, in terms even our bright eighth-grader would have no difficulty understanding.

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa8hSDVrRWjmJ2WxgzRvMt7V

And here's the single video from that playlist that pulls it all together, showing how the continuous "perpetual oscillations" are produced... and why a separate current source is needed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV2ePEbJ76I

(In other videos I demonstrate a simple 555-based Charge Pump Inverter that _does_ allow the main batteries to provide the necessary negative bias current. It will indeed be interesting to see how Ainslie's mob solves this little problem.)

[MarkE]

When Ms. Ainslie says that she will be applying a negative voltage to the gate of Q1 I expect that she means that she will still be using a function generator for that purpose as she has before.  The external power that the function generator supplies as seen August 11 was around 300mW.  It's non-zero but not very significant compared to the ~15W drawn from the batteries, the ~3W dissipated by her heater resistor, or the ~12W shortfall in between.  In order make up the ~12W deficit the impedance of the negative bias source has to come way down.  It is beyond the capability of any off the shelf function generator.

[TinselKoala]

When Ms. Ainslie says that she will be applying a negative voltage to the gate of Q1 I expect that she means that she will still be using a function generator for that purpose as she has before.  The external power that the function generator supplies as seen August 11 was around 300mW.  It's non-zero but not very significant compared to the ~15W drawn from the batteries, the ~3W dissipated by her heater resistor, or the ~12W shortfall in between.  In order make up the ~12W deficit the impedance of the negative bias source has to come way down.  It is beyond the capability of any off the shelf function generator.

In the manuscripts and the blog posts she indicated that the period set in the Figure 3 scopeshot was the longest "on" , i. e. the slowest frequency or longest period, with longest duty cycle proportions, that their IsoTech/Instek GFG-8216 FG could attain. Of course we cannot take Ainslie's word for this.... at one time she called in experts to "repair" her FG when in fact all she needed to do was to pull out the offset knob to engage its function. I don't see any capability for straight DC output from this FG, from looking at the FG manual. (My Interstate F43 does have a straight DC output setting, as well as being able to deliver 40 V p-p, with 50 ohm output impedance.)

So if they indeed want continuous oscillations, they are going to have to use some other source for the negative bias current than their present FG. How would they run the FG from the same batteries that are "powering the resistor" though? Stick an inverter in there to supply the line voltage to the FG?  Actually I doubt if any of the "more knowledgeable" members of Ainslie's mob have even confronted the issue, just as they were caught completely by surprise when they were tasked to reproduce the Figure 3 scopeshot with the wiring as claimed in the daft manuscripts.

(By the way... it is another abject lie of Ainslie, when she claims that Glen Lettenmeier has "withdrawn" his data. It is all still posted publicly, with full explanations and many many scopeshots, as Glen (FuzzyTomCat) has explained many times. He "withdrew" his permission for Ainslie to use the data in her attempts at submission for publication of manuscripts that make false claims.)

[MarkE]

I don't think that they will have any problem getting the oscillations going continuously.  I think that all they need to do is pick a waveform type (any will do) such as the square wave they have been using, set their amplitude to zero, and set the offset to maximum negative. The GFG-82xx generators can drive -5V offset into 50 Ohms.  That implies that the open circuit offset range is -10V which as you know from your own demonstrations is more than enough bias voltage to get the oscillations going.  Here is a link to the basic specifications for their function generator.

http://www.gwinstek.com/en/product/productdetail.aspx?pid=5&mid=73&id=99

[TinselKoala]

I don't think that they will have any problem getting the oscillations going continuously.  I think that all they need to do is pick a waveform type (any will do) such as the square wave they have been using, set their amplitude to zero, and set the offset to maximum negative. The GFG-82xx generators can drive -5V offset into 50 Ohms.  That implies that the open circuit offset range is -10V which as you know from your own demonstrations is more than enough bias voltage to get the oscillations going.  Here is a link to the basic specifications for their function generator.

http://www.gwinstek.com/en/product/productdetail.aspx?pid=5&mid=73&id=99

I attached the complete manual for the FG in the post up above.

Of course there is no difficulty making continuous oscillations once one has some kind of continuous DC bias source. Your suggestion might work with the Instek FG... but if so, one wonders why she had such difficulty doing so. She has spoken of wanting continuous oscillations for a long time, but the FG seemed unable to deliver them. Perhaps it's just because she didn't experiment enough with the settings available.

The trick, of course, is to get the continuous oscillations _without_ the FG. It's easy to do by using some other DC bias source. Ainslie thinks they can do it with the same batteries that are powering the element resistor. This is what I am interested in seeing.

And of course, without some Q1 fully ON time, there will be no high heat in the load.