Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

GRE? Yes, I will take a moment to boast.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graduate_Record_Examinations

When I sat these exams many years ago I was in the 99th percentile all the way across. Based on these scores and my undergraduate academic record I was accepted to graduate school at Stanford and MIT and some others, but I chose to attend the University of California at Santa Cruz, because they gave me a full stipend, teaching assistant positions, and a salary. Plus I like the scenery there. Better to be a big fish in a small pond, I reasoned, and I was right in my choice.

So every time the highschool dropout Ainslie, who doesn't even know what PI=3.14 means, mentions the GRE... she is proving over and over again just how ignorant and lazy she +really+ is.

[TinselKoala]

My internet is glacially slow this morning, but in half an hour or so the new video should be viewable.
http://youtu.be/RTTA80T0BU4

I'm pretty irate during this video, I sound like I'm about to pop my clutch; I'm still seething at the idiocy of the insulting disrespectful troll queen liar Rosemary Ainslie. Donovan Martin, or somebody, needs to rein in that woman, explain things to her in terms she might be capable of understanding. What's a single syllable word for "oscilloscope" I wonder?

[TinselKoala]

Her intellect is challenged alright.  Good word for it and it is her word from her own post.

Bill

Intellect? That is a term that doesn't apply to Rosemary Ainslie. She has a big vocabulary, and a mass of delusions, and a vile evil disposition, but no intellect, no honesty, no education, no skills, nothing like that at all.

[TinselKoala]

She just cannot stop being an idiot. Might as well expect a leopard to change its spots.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_carrier

Examples The electromagnetic force can be described by the exchange of virtual photons.
The nuclear force binding protons and neutrons can be described by an effective field of which mesons are the excitations.
At sufficiently large energies, the strong interaction between quarks can be described by the exchange of virtual gluons.
Beta decay is an example of an interaction due to the exchange of a W boson, but not an example of a force.
Gravitation may be due to the exchange of virtual gravitons.

http://www.physicsforidiots.com/particlesandforces.html

Bosons are the particles that carry force. They are characterised by having whole integer spin e.g. -1, 0, 1, and don't obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle, so you can have loads of them in the same space. Each of the fundamental forces of nature has its own Boson(s).
For Electromagnetism the force carrier is the Photon. They are sometimes called virtual photons as they only exist for very small intervals of time or space. If an electron gets near another electron it emits a virtual photon which is absorbed by the second electron and lets it know it need to move away.

http://sciencepark.etacude.com/particle/forces2.php

2. The electromagnetic force   Carrier: Photons (g)
Photons is responsible to 'carry' electromagnetic forces. It is also known as the particle of 'light' as they also 'carry' light as what we see. They have no mass, and no charge and can exchange between two particles over infinite distance. This is also the reason why light can travel to infinite distance and we can see stars that are far away. Detailed theoretical description of photons is given in quantum electrodynamics (QED).

http://home.web.cern.ch/about/physics/standard-model

Three of the fundamental forces result from the exchange of force-carrier particles, which belong to a broader group called "bosons". Particles of matter transfer discrete amounts of energy by exchanging bosons with each other. Each fundamental force has its own corresponding boson – the strong force is carried by the "gluon", the electromagnetic force is carried by the "photon", and the "W and Z bosons" are responsible for the weak force. Although not yet found, the "graviton" should be the corresponding force-carrying particle of gravity. The Standard Model includes the electromagnetic, strong and weak forces and all their carrier particles, and explains well how these forces act on all of the matter particles.

Do you want more? Find them yourself, then, Rosemary Idiot Ainslie. Or better yet... find a SINGLE VALID REFERENCE that agrees with YOU, for a change. You cannot -- because you are utterly, abjectly and transparently WRONG.

[TinselKoala]

When someone has magical beliefs it can be very difficult to devise tests.  In the latest bit of pretzel logic, Ms. Ainslie objects to your proposal to disconnect the Q2 source pin as a way of testing whether current goes through the function generator during the "Q1 Off" times or not. 

OK so the hypothesis is that Q1 is essential to these oscillations.  Then just disconnect the gate lead of Q1 and connect that to the Q1 source, or disconnect Q1 completely.  If the oscillations still occur, then the hypothesis that Q1 is carrying the circuit current during the oscillations is disproved.  Assuming that is the case, since you have already shown that it is so, then the Q2 source can be disconnected.  Let's see what Ms. Ainlie's objection is to testing her claim.

Well.... then just lower the cut point to below the connection to the Q1 gate. This leaves the Q2 source connected to the Q1 gate as normal, but disconnects the FG from both. What happens then, AINSLIE? You get nothing, that's what. No heat, no current flow, no oscillations at all, because you have disconnected the FG.

The video does not show that test. What would be the point? It would be like not hooking up the battery and expecting something to happen.

What it does show, however, is that Ainslie manages to contradict herself completely ("The Q2 mosfets are disconnected while oscillating" but they "must be connected in order to oscillate") and be utterly wrong (the connection doesn't do what she claims it does and is unnecessary) at the same time. That takes some doing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTTA80T0BU4

I can't wait to see what nonsense and insults she'll spew after this. Tangled up in her own web of calumny, that troll queen is.