Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[TinselKoala]

Any one who wants to know why and how someone gets banned, several times over, from this forum should check the various threads that are still preserved here where a certain Great Scientist filled up page after page with insults and false claims and refusals to cooperate and broken promises to re-test or even to supply old data. That, plus the fact that the Great Scientist made (empty, imaginary) threats of lawsuits to just about everyone including our host Stefan, explains the repeated warnings and bannings that cause the Great Scientist to be banished to her own private hell. Several other website forum owners feel the same way. Naked Scientists: banned for repeatedly ignoring the rules and for continuing to argue facts with her better-educated and professional correspondents there. Threads preserved in their archive. Energetic Forum: at first the Great Scientist caused quite a stir there, but when even the credulous researchers there found out the truth about the claims made by the Great Scientist and started feeling her rancor and venomous attacks upon her critics... banned again she was. The editorial policy of that site is such that many of the sins of the Great Scientist, along with the critical analyses of them, have been vanished down the memory hole, but enough remains that one may get the gist of the matter.

[MarkE]

OK perhaps now we have a good upload.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a1plHZwmWg

That was a very nice demonstration.  If you are interested in doing anymore demonstrations you can modify the set-up to remove the wire wound resistor and  flip the Kelvinish probe around.  Then insert 6" of bare wire between the battery negative and the Kelvinish probe.  Then compare the readings from the Kelvinish probe and a probe with the probe hook fixed half an inch to the right of the Kelvinish probe, and taking different readings while moving the ground clip from next to the Kelvinish probe in steps until you get to the battery negative.  The point of the demonstration would be to illustrate how Ms. Ainslie and her collaborators got the results that they did not understand during the June 29, 2013 demonstration.  Finally, when you have the ground clip at the battery, then move the probe hook from the Q1 side of the Kelvinish probe to the battery negative side of the Kelvinish probe.  You will then have shown the many secrets of the L/R high pass network.

[TinselKoala]

Thanks. Yes, that's an excellent suggestion for a further demonstration, I'll put it on the list. I usually get a burst of energy around 11 pm and work until 4 am or so, so we shall see what happens tonight.

Meanwhile, I have been trying to figure out that old Epic Instruments Wavesaver that a friend donated to the TKLab. It's tricky. Perhaps some combination of me not knowing how to operate it, and old capacitors inside it, is preventing me from getting coherent results with it. I can get it to save and display some simple waveform inputs like a square wave from the FG, but even those aren't quite right. I haven't even tried to save something as complicated as a typical Ainslie burst oscillatory set. No point in even trying, until I know what I'm doing with it and have checked the unit internally. A manual with schematic would really be helpful but this seems to be a real "orphan" instrument that nobody has heard of.


I am slightly puzzled as to why, after all these years of exposure, other researchers haven't decomposed the Ainslie experience the way we've done over the past couple of weeks.  Oh well, there it is, now that I've shown what I've shown in the last four or so vids, and now that Ainslie has emitted her response, to the main one at least.... it will be plainly evident to any person who is newly interested in Ainslie's claims just what they can expect from her.

[MarkE]

Thanks. Yes, that's an excellent suggestion for a further demonstration, I'll put it on the list. I usually get a burst of energy around 11 pm and work until 4 am or so, so we shall see what happens tonight.

Meanwhile, I have been trying to figure out that old Epic Instruments Wavesaver that a friend donated to the TKLab. It's tricky. Perhaps some combination of me not knowing how to operate it, and old capacitors inside it, is preventing me from getting coherent results with it. I can get it to save and display some simple waveform inputs like a square wave from the FG, but even those aren't quite right. I haven't even tried to save something as complicated as a typical Ainslie burst oscillatory set. No point in even trying, until I know what I'm doing with it and have checked the unit internally. A manual with schematic would really be helpful but this seems to be a real "orphan" instrument that nobody has heard of.


I am slightly puzzled as to why, after all these years of exposure, other researchers haven't decomposed the Ainslie experience the way we've done over the past couple of weeks.  Oh well, there it is, now that I've shown what I've shown in the last four or so vids, and now that Ainslie has emitted her response, to the main one at least.... it will be plainly evident to any person who is newly interested in Ainslie's claims just what they can expect from her.

It takes time, materials and knowledge to deal with these sorts of claims.  Poynt99 dealt with some of them, but the message seemed to go right past Ms. Ainslie, as did the messages in your videos.  Greg has posted that he doesn't understand what it is that you were trying to show.  The book cover above has a short list of things that you have demonstrated.

[TinselKoala]

ERRATUM:
In the last video, I give the part number of the non-inductive resistor I used in the Kelvinish probe as WNER50FE, which is the part number for the 0.5 ohm resistor in that series. The actual part number for the resistor in the probe is WNE1R0FE, the one-ohm unit. Sorry about the confusion, rest assured as the DMM showed the resistor in the unit is indeed one ohm.
I'll be placing an annotation in the video to this effect right away.
Thanks again for pointing this out, MarkE.