Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[MarkE]

The whole 2011 MOSFET's connected in parallel when they were really cross connected source to gate was really bad for her credibility.  Suppose that they didn't know at the time of the demonstration that the wires were crossed.  As incompetent as that might have been, it still would have been innocent, had they reported the actual connections as soon as they were discovered.  It is Ms. Ainslie who claims that they deliberately did not do so.  That's a hell of an admission to make.  Then we saw similar things with the June 29 demonstration where only after three and a half hours Donovan Martin admitted that the function generator was not connected as shown in the documents they said that they were reproducing.

[TinselKoala]

It's interesting that you should mention that.

As FuzzyTomCat has documented, the very first descriptions of the 5-mosfet device contained the same schematic that Donovan Martin gestures to in the 2011 demonstration, "This is what you have before you, five mosfets in parallel" or something like that, where the Black lead of the FG isn't even shown, but the actual hardware shows it very visibly connected to the common circuit ground, the bypass position. When this "error" was pointed out and its significance explained to Ainslie.... rather suddenly the "corrected" schematics appeared, which showed the correct, non-bypass location of the Black FG lead..... but obviously this correct location was not the one they _actually_ used.

In plain language, the schematics in the daft manuscripts today, and ever since that early date, have been lies, told and endorsed by Ainslie, Martin, and the other co-authors.

Not only that, but all of the current data in the manuscripts was gathered with the FG Black lead in the _incorrect_, bypass location, completely invalidating it for that reason alone. (There are other invalidating reasons as well.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

"As you can see" even the person operating the camera knows that there are not "five mosfets in parallel".

The filenames for the schematics below are as FuzzyTomCat assigned them.

[MarkE]

It's interesting that you should mention that.

As FuzzyTomCat has documented, the very first descriptions of the 5-mosfet device contained the same schematic that Donovan Martin gestures to in the 2011 demonstration, "This is what you have before you, five mosfets in parallel" or something like that, where the Black lead of the FG isn't even shown, but the actual hardware shows it very visibly connected to the common circuit ground, the bypass position. When this "error" was pointed out and its significance explained to Ainslie.... rather suddenly the "corrected" schematics appeared, which showed the correct, non-bypass location of the Black FG lead..... but obviously this correct location was not the one they _actually_ used.

In plain language, the schematics in the daft manuscripts today, and ever since that early date, have been lies, told and endorsed by Ainslie, Martin, and the other co-authors.

Not only that, but all of the current data in the manuscripts was gathered with the FG Black lead in the _incorrect_, bypass location, completely invalidating it for that reason alone. (There are other invalidating reasons as well.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neME1s-lEZE

"As you can see" even the person operating the camera knows that there are not "five mosfets in parallel".

The filenames for the schematics below are as FuzzyTomCat assigned them.

Don't forget that when it came to connecting the Chl 1 current sense scope probe they botched that as well.

[Pirate88179]

Wow!  Nano does sound a lot like IST.  I always wondered what happened to him.  The man wound a lot of toroids back in the early days of the original JT topic.

I believe his name was William.

Bill

ETA:  Just realized that Nano is Atommix come back from the banned from about 2 weeks ago.  I still think he is IST as well.  Syntax is identical.

[Tseak]

There's an old adage  -  Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not see the difference. Have a nice day Ninibot.