Rosemary Ainslie Quantum Magazine Circuit COP > 17 Claims

[MarkE]

Paranoia strikes deep.
Into your life it will creep.
Starts when polly's always afraid.
Step out of line,
And the cat comes and swallows away.

[MarkE]

I need to point out that oscilloscope traces taken with improper probing do not show valid data.  It is not enough for Ms. Ainslie or anyone else to just show oscilloscope traces.  They need to show that the traces faithfully represent the quantities claimed.

[TinselKoala]

I need to point out that oscilloscope traces taken with improper probing do not show valid data.  It is not enough for Ms. Ainslie or anyone else to just show oscilloscope traces.  They need to show that the traces faithfully represent the quantities claimed.

Agreed, of course.

But I don't mind seeing Ainslie's _improper_ traces either, because duplicating them, as I have done, is part of the general program of illustrating that her "work" and her claims are utterly bogus. If the scope traces SHE produces can't even honestly make anything that looks like COP>1, that is just so much more proof that she and her claims are totally bogus. Comparing, side by side, the properly obtained data with the garbage she and her mob of Keystone Kops puts out, is an important part of debunking her bunk.

This bogus "negative power product" is a case in point. It's clear that the heavy spikes produced by the Plain Q17 w/ MarkE boost circuit are going to yield a massive "negative power product" when measured and processed according to Ainslie's methods. Yet... where is _any other evidence_ that shows that those "negative power products" have any real physical meaning, any consequences to the actual performance, in terms of heating or battery life? Nowhere, in Ainslie's data or in mine, that's where.

[MarkE]

I wanted to talk to you so more about the waveforms you put out yesterday.  A couple of things looked a little squirrely. 

That aside Ms. Ainslie's understanding is so poor that she thinks bigger spikes are actually an advantage when just the opposite is true.  The bigger the BEMF voltage spike the faster the current decays in the heater resistor, the more of the magnetic field energy dissipates in leakage across parasitic capacitance, and therefore the less heating energy obtained per switching cycle.  The clamp diode and capacitor recirculate the stored magnetic field energy through the resistor with only the diode loss, maximizing heating efficiency.  But since Ms. Ainslie doesn't understand a thing about electronics, this is all Greek to her.

As you well know, the absurd probing methods that Ms. Ainslie employs generate all kinds of measurement problems.  It seems that she will never learn.

[TinselKoala]

That's all exactly right, and the benefits of the diode can be seen very clearly in my magnetic levitation apparatus, which uses the "power section" identically to Ainslie's (and the mosfet data sheet's) circuit. Without the diode across the levitation coil, the system is noisy, heats the mosfet up much more, and can only produce half as much "levitation distance". When the fast diode is placed across the coil, these inefficiencies go away, the mosfet stays cool and the levitation distance and smoothness is much improved.

But does Ainslie use a diode, or not? Nobody knows. There is NOT one shown in the original Quantum circuit. The Lost Grey Box, altered by Ainslie's mob sometime after 2007, does contain a diode but it is not connected to anything except some banana jacks and is not shown in the SWeir reverse-engineered circuit as being part of the circuit. The IEEE paper submission falsely states that "This circuit was used" for the original 2002 Quantum article.... but it shows a DIODE in place. The "Q-Array" circuits, all five of them that Ainslie has claimed or shown, none of them contain a diode. No diodes have appeared in any of the three comedic "demonstrations" from the Ainslie krewe.

However, I tested the claimed circuits with and without flyback diodes, beginning in 2009. In those days I showed the effect on the Quantum Magazine circuit, and I showed how the diode CAN be used to charge up _external_ batteries and capacitors quite well, transferring charge by using the spikes or "siphoning" them as I call it, by the diode, into the external store.