Proof of Overunity From Magnets Fixture, No Negative Work Aspect, LaFonte

[Floor]

@ GammaRayBurst

Floor, I think the plate set would rotate if hinged in the middle but would stop when set went from repulsion to attraction mode. I am thinking that would vary with the geometry of the plate. I doubt it would do a total 180 degree flip.  Maybe more like 45 degrees?
Butch LaFonte

MAGNETS would flip to 90 deg,  if hinged,  or if upon an axle.  I don't know if the two magnets and  plates in (SET B) would behave the same way....  But I think they would also rotate 90 deg. off.

Also I wonder if the magnets in (SET B) could be easily reversed (pseudo solid fashion) WHILE AT 90 DEG. TO (SETS A and C)?
Considering that they would  be under the influence of both (SETS A  and C) ? If so,  (SET B) could then rotate an additional 90 deg. and so on.

                  Thanks for your time/response
                         Keep up the good work
                                  Floor

                                           

[gammarayburst]

@ GammaRayBurst

Floor, I think the plate set would rotate if hinged in the middle but would stop when set went from repulsion to attraction mode. I am thinking that would vary with the geometry of the plate. I doubt it would do a total 180 degree flip.  Maybe more like 45 degrees?
Butch LaFonte

MAGNETS would flip to 90 deg,  if hinged,  or if upon an axle.  I don't know if the two magnets and  plates in (SET B) would behave the same way....  But I think they would also rotate 90 deg. off.

Also I wonder if the magnets in (SET B) could be easily reversed (pseudo solid fashion) WHILE AT 90 DEG. TO (SETS A and C)?
Considering that they would  be under the influence of both (SETS A  and C) ? If so,  (SET B) could then rotate an additional 90 deg. and so on.

                  Thanks for your time/response
                         Keep up the good work
                                  Floor

                                           

Floor, I will do a test and see just exactly what will happen. It's a very interesting question you have come up with.
Butch

[Floor]

@GammaRayBurst

Hey, thank you for the response.  Based upon your last set of drawings posted,  it looks to me like you've got it worked out.  I hope my ideas will not be a distraction from where yours are going.  This might be premature, but congratulations. 

I presume that the ends of the bar sets"A and B" IN YOUR LAST DRAWINGS, where they touch each other, will need to be very flat.  I have some ideas about this,  I will do some drawings and post them when I have time.

                                                         floor

                                               

[Floor]

@GammaRayBurst

Please fin the attached Jpg file "pseudo solid lap joint"

                                  regards
                                       floor

[gammarayburst]

@GammaRayBurst

I have a question, that I am not sure if you know the answer to or not.

Please see the attached file "PsuSol3.JPEG" drawings and question.

                                              Cheers
                                                       floor

Floor, I made a big mistake when looking at your drawing the first time. I thought that all magnets were in repulsion. I can't believe I didn't look close enough to see that each plate set has two magnets in attraction to each other. This way I hate to say the flux will flow in a straight path between plate magnet sets and run parallel to the next plate set magnets and not offer much repulsion. But, I think I see a design coming out of this that would really open up " Pseudo Solid Principle " so the public will be able to grasp it. I will make a drawing and post.
Butch
Butch