Building a self looping "SMOT"

[JouleSeeker]

  IMO

  One of these days, someone is going to successfully tie into a previously UNTAPPED SOURCE OF ENERGY and share his result freely with others. And someone will successfully replicate.
   This will not violate any "laws of physics," but rather, will represent a breakthrough energy source.

  IMO.

[truesearch]

@elecar:


So is the bottom line here that nothing "real" or "productive" will be shown until at least Nov. 19th??


Don't take me wrong, I really would like to see a working design, but after so many have proved out wrong, we get cynical. 


truesearch

[Liberty]

Bill did a great attempted smot a few years ago, i met the inventor of the first one, he lives in Australia. its a fun challenge to try and beat and good luck with that. Ultimately you have to overcome some laws of nature, never say never..but unlikely.
Best of Luck
PS TK is respected because of his logic and brilliance
Kind Regards
Mark

"TK is respected because of his logic and brilliance"

There would be more respect and brilliance if he would come up with his own over-unity device by making it public here, rather than trying to forcefully uncover "how other devices fail", or by trying to disprove devices from other individuals.  If the device doesn't work, it will be obvious all by itself, when it is time for it to perform, or when it is explained by the individual.

Regards

[TinselKoala]

Hilarious!

Sure, if I come up with a real overunity device, this is the very first place I'll be telling anyone about it. Right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6itJ1GkTqI

Let me drop a few names into your black hole funnel:

Archer Quinn.
Mylow.
Wayne Travis.
Rosemary Ainslie.

Fakers, liars and frauds each one, and each one had multiple threads here, wasting people's time and money with their false claims.

Quinn took money from people, never produced what he claimed, and vanished into the outback.
Mylow.... took money from people, got his brother to lie outrageously for him live on camera, invited Sterling to a site visit to see his apparatus, made many videos ... and was soundly proven to be a faker, by video analysis.
Wayne Travis could not produce credible evidence of his claims, had TWO site visits from Mark Dansie... and is now being sued by early investors for failure to deliver on his claims, and still cannot produce any evidence.
Rosemary Ainslie..... after years of insulting behaviour and false claims, being banned from this forum multiple times and other forums as well, even abandoned by her former supporters, also got other people to lie for her; tried to publish falsified data and was finally humiliated in public when she and her crew tried to reproduce their data AND COULD NOT DO IT in more-or-less public demonstrations that I had nothing at all to do with-- and was forced to issue retractions, even though she still dishonestly allows her "papers" with the fabricated data to exist on the internet.

Call me a moron and a prick all you like, it doesn't bother me. Mylows, Quinns, Travises, Ainslies, and the rest are much more creative in their insults. Each and every one of them levied many stronger insults against me, Ainslie even threatened me multiple times. The more I am insulted by claimants, the more certain I am that they cannot produce what they claim, and there is a LOT of history supporting that position. When the claimant even descends into insulting our host as elecar has begun to do, and even, like Ainslie, threatens HIM... then I know for certain that the claimant cannot produce credible evidence.

[TinselKoala]

I find amusement in the fact that TK's snot video supports Elecars claim.

TK took the SMOT concept and boiled it down into a very simple setup, magnet in and out, gravity in and out and friction just out.

This is, with some artistic license,, the usual setup, and so if one were to work, then it must be a unique setup,, which is what Elecar claimed,, a unique method.

As a small side note,, TK might of provided a solution to the SMOT problem without realizing it,,  to me is also funny

You think the video supports elecar's claim... but it doesn't seem like elecar agrees with you!

I told you before I posted the video that I could show you how to minimize losses in your track. I fully realize what I've shown and demonstrated. Let me say it again: Any "self looping smot" must incorporate the start position/ramp, whatever, into the looping. Mine does not, and neither do any of the videos from elecar that I have seen. Elecar CLAIMED a unique method but what he SHOWED is the same old, same old tired SMOT that doesn't work and doesn't ever bring the ball back up to the starting elevation. If he's got something else, he is perfectly free to show it off. If he actually has a patent application on the books, that right there is legal protection of his IP, retroactive to the date of his application.... IF the patent is actually granted.
You may note from several of elecar's recent posts that he can't figure out how to do what he has claimed he can do. Look at the trouble he _says_ he had making the video of several completed loops for LibreEnergia!