Super simple way to see proof Pseudo Solid principle works using ring magnets

[gammarayburst]

Nope. I suggest you try a very simple experiment:
Take 10 marbles and devide the number in to two groups of 5 marbles.
1. Move the first group to the left, and then back BEFORE you move the second group to the right and then back.
2. Move the first group to the left, and then back AFTER you move the second group to the right and then back.[/size]
How many marbles do you have after 1. and 2. experiment? I guess you still have 10 marbles in total. You can arrange these marbles in any way you want, but you will still have 10 marbles to play with.


The same applies to magnetism. You cannot "destroy" or "create" the total flux from a magnet on your demand without energy inputs.
In a closed system there is no change in the sum of forces due to magnetism.


You can prove me wrong if you do a practical experiment with the design you recently came up with - or play with those marbles. Doesn't matter. If you end up in having a working device, or end up with 11 or more marbles after experimenting with the initial 10 pcs, I will be convinced that you're right.


Sorry, but I don't believe anything before I can see it before my own eyes.


Vidar

Marbles? What about the trillions of "marbles" inside the marbles with electrons in orbit around each?

[Floor]

@GammarayBurst

               very cool
I just want to make certain that I have  understood the sequence correctly.

                         please find the attached file "PS Mar 20. jpeg"
                         
                        stay cool
                             floor

[norman6538]

Floor, I like your sequence drawings but a little more is needed.
1. a pivot for the bars
2. what makes the bars slide left and right?
3. Where is the work done by the metal attraction?
4. what makes the magnets slide back and forth?

Then until all these forces are measured its only an idea on paper
and I have MANY paper drawn ideas that failed the measurement tests.

no measurements - no proof - PERIOD

Norman

[norman6538]

The following is based on a magnet attracted to metal and a spring
for power storage.

the further you pull a spring the more work potential you can store
in that spring.

that stored power can then be used right away..
and if you use a magnet to pull that spring then
its free if you can escape the magnet sticky spot....


1. the power source is the magnet
2. the power is stored in the spring for later use
3. more power is available from the lever connection
   matching the spring and magnetic characteristics.
   
   
4. and the escape is via the Lafonte slider..... what post?
  it works because its magnet to metal attraction which is
  escapeable whereas  magnet to magnet that is not escapeable...
 
5. the reset/repeat would be available by the power stored
   from the magnet in the spring.... if the efficiency is
   over 200%   100% to  mechanically return/reset and
   100% to start the process over again...
   I would use 2 springs for each portion of that...

I have achieved excess work out over work in but not enough over 200%
to reset and repeat the process...

The following idea is what started all of the above.


gammarayburst: said on  September 06, 2013, 06:06:52 AM »

Norman, it will slide so easy you could push it with a feather.
Think of sliding a magnet down the side of a file cabinet with an air
  gap of .003" between the magnet and metal side. That is what I base the
  whole Pseudo Solid principle on. It won't grab on to anything till it
  gets to the end of the metal cabinet. There is no end with the bars
  in this. I have many video's showing this on youtube at the LaFonte
  Research and LaFonte Group site for 5 years now. Think of a magnet
   sliding down the front of your refrigerator door. The only reason it
    does not slide all the time is because of the friction between it
     and the door surface. Put an air gap of .003" between the two and
      watch it slide down like a rock being dropped.

Butch

[gammarayburst]

@GammarayBurst

               very cool
I just want to make certain that I have  understood the sequence correctly.

                         please find the attached file "PS Mar 20. jpeg"
                         
                        stay cool
                             floor

Floor, yes, the sequence is correct. Remember it can have more than one magnet if you like. Saturation must also be considered.
Thanks Floor, Butch