Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


222% Energy Conversion.

Started by DaS Energy, December 12, 2013, 09:57:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DaS Energy

Many claim the Francis turbine to be 82% efficient in energy conversion. Many others claim the Steam turbine to be 60% efficient.

Whenever steam/gas and water be in a container together, the water is the same pressure as the steam/gas and the steam/gas is the same pressure as the water.

Steam/gas will move water at the same pressure that the steam/gas is.

Steam/gas from behind pushing water through a Francis turbine converts 82% of the water flow into mechanical energy. Steam/gas from in front pushing water through a Francis turbine converts 82% of the water flow into mechanical energy. Steam/gas passing through a steam/gas turbine converts 60% of the steam/gas flow into mechanical energy.

Whatever steam pressure and volume you begin with you still have 100% of at the steam turbine.

Two conversions of 82% and one of 60% gives a total conversion of 222%. All of which comes from the original steam/gas  generated in the boiler or elsewhere.

DaS Energy

Three attempts made at removing the wrong attachment, three times the site refused to allow!

mscoffman

DaS Energy;

Your systematic, diagram based device proposals might well be considered to be *implementable
via 3D printing*. By using analogous systems that shift the temperature points of the working fluids
downward, one might be able to actually implement these systems for very low costs. One could then
incrementally improve the operation of subsystems by increasing device complexity only as needed.
The thermal conductivity of plastic materials could be increased via metal inserts. You would then be able
to validate the theoretical math as you proceed. I generally like the idea of being able to go from theoretics
to physical test systems in a seemless , inexpensive and incremental fashion.

:S:MarkSCoffman

TinselKoala

Wrong. Taking the numbers as given:

The first "82 percent efficient conversion" yields (input power x 0.82) = output power.

The second "82 percent" yields output power = (0.82 x 0.82) x input power.

The third "60 percent" yields output power = (0.82 x 0.82 x 0.60) x input power.

For a total output power of a little over 40 percent of the input power.

You cannot add or multiply or chain together individual processes that are each "under unity" or less than 100 percent efficiency, and wind up with something that is OU!

DaS Energy

Bloke once saw an elephant and spent the rest of his life denying there be such animal.