Reactive power - Reactive Generator research from GotoLuc - discussion thread

[Farmhand]

OH I see, gotcha drift now. Yes I would say a small load probably could be drawn without extra loading on the motor.

Go well

[alex]

I'm with you, Farmhand. Stay firm.
They can fool scope, but not the counter on the wall.
Look at the last video at the end, by frame (split of second) - battery went way down when load switched off compare as it was before the start, and meter shows the steady reading while running.
If it would be there any gain (or even consumption), meter will show the RAISE voltage on the battery after load went off.
Anyway,  time will show the truth. To me it's wrong. Misleading.
No offense, Luc, just thoughts loud out.

[Cap-Z-ro]

If this is actually wrong, it will be proven out in the end...ON ITS OWN MERIT !!!

All you nay sayers and nit pickers are doing it littering the langscape with endless drivel...effectively drowing out ant meaningful discussion and free exchange of ideas.

Is that your intention ?

I asked on another popular thread here that this activity cease...apparently some people cannot help themselves - OR  they are paid distractors.

Which are you ?

Nevertheless...stop !!!...sit back and watch...and keep your hands  off the keypad, and stay the hell out of the way...like myself and all the other people not currently at the bench.

If not, be prepared...I can get right down to it on a personal level, by disecting your personality and motives here.

I will not stand by a watch as you try to overwhelm and run off Luc with your negative crap, as you have systematically to other enthusiastic contributors who have left because of YOU !!!

Otherwise...a Happy New Year to all the real people here.

Regards...

[Farmhand]

Cap-Z-ro, Just how pray tell would anything be shown to be a mistake if no one investigates exactly what is going on and it is fully explained ?

Don't worry I'll show some bench video when and if I am good and ready. This is a discussion forum. I do experiments. I've been very unwell and unable to do anything much at all but I am recovering.

I am subject to moderation. Don't get ya knickers in a knot over me. I heeded Luc's request as far as I am concerned. And will continue to do so. As far as I am concerned I am discussing possibilities. And also responding.

I respect your right to say what you think but I do not have to agree.

Why not make some more personal attacks and say what you really think ?

I am unaffected by your personal opinion of people looking at possibilities to explore in order to better explain what is seen.

I'm posting because I'm interested in finding truth. If the arrangement is able to harness extra energy it needs to be explained. If not but there is a benefit then it ought to be shown what that benefit is and how it occurs.

Regards

P.S. If Luc likes I will remove the offending post or text, or he can but I will not remove any valid questions or my opinions/thoughts on topic. And since I see that Luc is the moderator, I will take no further part in this thread. I can always start my own discussion to get free speech.

..

[poynt99]

Capz,

Analyze this if you wish:

If someone were to post a claim that they've discovered the average of -6 and +5 is -11, and you took the time to correct them and show them why they are wrong, would you be considered a naysayer, or a teacher?