Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tugger (shortly: AMT)

Started by ageofmagnetizm, December 26, 2013, 10:43:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ageofmagnetizm


@truesearch


Thanks for this question.
Never thought that my sketches of geometry of magnetic fields can be
comprehend so different.


Indeed my drawings are some different from similar conventional systems.
When I compare two images of fields of bar magnets from my report and
drawing of "cylindrical magnet" which you've scripted here, - than I see
that both have "fields lines" indicating directions of magnetomotive forces
round magnets. Both images have these lines suddenly interrupted, but on yours -
painted lines discontinue at the edges of image, and on mine - painted green vectors
discontinue by semi-circular contour-lines which indicate equipotential planes where all measured forces are equal in magnitude. If measuring device is calibrating
for higher sensitivity - than length of drawn vectors increase and second pairs
of contour lines can be painted above-over, following measurements allows to paint
more and more contour-lines and elongating vectors become connecting
opposite magnetic poles of the bar magnet. Such image will become identical to yours
but also having contour-lines indicating change of magnitude of forces.
Its very seldom when I conduct such extensive measurements, just
for pure academic curiosity, - oftenly, I measure magnetomotive forces
in that volume of space where its direction and magnitude are important for experiments,
hence my drawings can be continued with longer vectors covering whole
planes of drawings, but such drawings would not provide better comprehension of
experiments. But that does not means that "field-lines" are COMPLETELY broken"
- they simply not painted further where its parameters are unimportant for presentation.


Obviously that "lines" go somewhere, most of connect to "lines" of opposite pole
of same magnet, others go to opposite poles of other magnets, and some of them
go event to magnetic poles of planetary magnetic fields. Soon later I'll read some more about geometries of "reluctant magnetic circuits" which you've mentioned
in the second part of your question.


Do not hesitate to ask about anything else - this increase my comprehension of others
comprehension of me, and allows to improve quality of following reports.

truesearch

@ageofmagnetizm:


Thanks for your response to my ignorant concern ~ it's obvious that you want to share your knowledge and experience  :)


On another note, there was a link posted on another thread for Ken Wheeler's "Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism" book. Here it is if anyone wants to see it:
http://www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf


truesearch

ageofmagnetizm


@@truesearch


I've looked through my reports again and found that its explained that
green vectors indicate geometry of 'measured' magnetomotive forces
near, along or around particular objects - not whole magnetic fields as far
as possible. Direction of arrows indicates direction of attraction
(not repulsion) and lengths of arrows indicate magnitude of force which
is also indicated by contour-lines.


Now about that that:
"then the magnetic force will stop pushing/tugging to make continual motion."
Indeed, your suggestion is OK. I've build several prototypes of sections of
magnetic motors which manifest good results in section but can not be build
in rings, and I've seen many build by others which stubs for the same reason.
One of such motor I have published and it is on my YouTube channel at:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXma6_-iHok


When its stator is build in ring then reluctance of its magnetic circuits
dramatically drops down and forces near magnetorefracting screens
become too weak for propulsion of motive magnet.
Such effect can not occur in my discussing here arrangements of
magnetomotive trains.


Explanation of my current arrangement of reluctant magnetic circuits
can be simplified to one pair of bar magnets - one dynamic magnet being
perpendicular to the axle of motor and capable to move, and one
static magnet being parallel to the axle.
Dynamic magnet has its North pole toward axle and South pole
toward static magnet, static magnet has its North pole toward South pole
of dynamic magnet hence these poles attracting each others.
Magnets attract by nearest magnetic poles but they also could attract by
distant magnetic poles such forcing magnets to become parallel to
each others but there is no attraction because that those distant poles
are attached to ferromagnetic components of motor which absorb
magnetic flux of those poles and there
"magnetic force ... stop pushing/tugging" as you've suggested.
But this can not happens between interacting magnetic poles because that
there is permanent air gap which function as reluctant part of
reluctant magnetic circuit formed by two magnets and ferromagnetic
components which form loop including: base- magnet-air-magnet - hub.
Building of such loops in series round hub - does not influence permeability
of air between interacting magnetic poles,
hence reluctance of magnetic circuits remains constant and magnitude
of magnetomotive forces remains constant too, moreover -
interacting magnets continuously magnetize each others what cause that
magnets remain as strong as possible for its molecular composition.


I'll be glad to read more suggestions of possible reasons of malfunctions.

ageofmagnetizm

Asymmetric Magnetomotive Panels also are discussing here.
Said Panels are ambient fields propulsion systems made of
Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tractors which are dipolar variants of
Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tuggers made of permanent magnets
having structures of complex magnetic permeability attached to both
magnetic poles of utilizing magnets.[size=78%] [/size]
So producing magnetic fields have artificial geometry what causes that
ambient magnetic fields tugs Panels perpendicular to vectors of
magnetomotive forces of ambient fields.
Construction and function of Asymmetric Magnetomotive Panels are
explained in the second paragraph at:


https://sites.google.com/site/ageofmagnetizm/home/magnetomechanics/magnetorefractive/geomagnetic/magnetomachanical/asymmetric-magnetomotive-tuggers/asymmetric-magnetomotive-panels


Following is photo of tested prototype of Panel made of four
Dipolar Asymmetric Tractors, where green vectors indicate
magnetomotive forces measured round/along of panel.

ageofmagnetizm

Wow! Dipolar Asymmetric Magnetomotive Tractors are selected for the Deep Space CamSat challenge organized within SpaceApps - a NASA incubator innovation program.[/font][/size]https://2015.spaceappschallenge.org/project/dipolar-asymmetric-magnetomotive-tractors/[/size]Everyone round our glob can register there and take part in virtual brainstorming over next weekend.[/size]