Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Pulsed Magnet Motor Takahashi

Started by JulienVictor, December 26, 2013, 04:34:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JulienVictor

Hello

I made a little drawing of how I understand the Takahashi motor. As when the motor turns the rotor is giving away power over the hole time, the coil is loaded only a fraction of the time..., but I think all here know the principe.

The questions I have are the following,
-If I intensifie the perm. magnets X times, must there also be used X times more energy for the pole creation by the coil?
-If I intensifie the perm. magnets X times, goes then X times the torque and X times the turns per second up, so that the rotational power increase X^2 times? (As the rotational energy is (rad/sec) * nm)
-Would the rotor even accelerate?

Kind regards

Julien


( I wanted to modifie the picture, now there are 2 showing the same motor)

Paul-R

 
I think you have Yasunori Takahashi's design slightly wrong. This may help:

http://www.cheniere.org/misc/wankel.htm

N.B. The direction of rotation is different in the two drawings.

JulienVictor

The direction is actually the same I saw, on Bearden's site it's just "mirrored" to mine. The principle of both is the same.