Thread for naysayers, nitpickers, and shills

[gauschor]

Ah, finally a thread to vent off...

NOTHING.FUCKING.WORKS.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[MileHigh]

Quote from Captain Zero:

There are more than 2 paid  in operation on this thread

I am asking people reading this thread to denounce this type of behaviour.  It's unacceptable and smacks of the 1930s.  Shall people that argue the technical merits of a proposition wear a special symbol on our clothing?

Captain Zero knows zero about me in real life and he fails to look at propositions in an unbiased manner.  He often ignores the reprehensible forum behaviour of people putting forth dubious or outright ridiculous propositions if he (mistakenly) believes they have merit, even if they are jaw-droppingly ridiculous, and I am not being specific to this thread.  The reality is that sometimes propositions are put forth that someone with basic common sense and no technical skills and education would recognize as being false.

The fact that Captain Zero would even suspect that there are paid operatives here to rebut simplistic or ridiculous propositions that don't make any sense says much about Captain Zero and nothing about the person promoting the false proposition or the person rebutting the false proposition with logical arguments.

Again, I am asking people to publicly denounce this kind of behaviour.  It is simply unacceptable and he should not be allowed to get away with it.

MileHigh

[Cap-Z-ro]

I know nothing of this character in real life...just another desperate delusionary distortion put forward to try to salvage self destroyed credibility.

He/she/it/they have been outed by other members besides me for incessantly preventing the development of many ideas up for discussion, because it is well known that that is how other things are discovered.

This important dialogue process was proven out again yesterday in an experiment conducted by TinMan, inspired by a very persistent Theo, who endured 9 yards of Sh!t flung in his path by the MH entity and his cohorts.

That never would have happened if he had given up in frustration, as so many before him had done.

Facts are facts.

Case proven and rested.

Regards...

[MarkE]

Quote from Captain Zero:

I am asking people reading this thread to denounce this type of behaviour.  It's unacceptable and smacks of the 1930s.  Shall people that argue the technical merits of a proposition wear a special symbol on our clothing?

Captain Zero knows zero about me in real life and he fails to look at propositions in an unbiased manner.  He often ignores the reprehensible forum behaviour of people putting forth dubious or outright ridiculous propositions if he (mistakenly) believes they have merit, even if they are jaw-droppingly ridiculous, and I am not being specific to this thread.  The reality is that sometimes propositions are put forth that someone with basic common sense and no technical skills and education would recognize as being false.

The fact that Captain Zero would even suspect that there are paid operatives here to rebut simplistic or ridiculous propositions that don't make any sense says much about Captain Zero and nothing about the person promoting the false proposition or the person rebutting the false proposition with logical arguments.

Again, I am asking people to publicly denounce this kind of behaviour.  It is simply unacceptable and he should not be allowed to get away with it.

MileHigh

People who make wild claims that they cannot support end-up discrediting themselves.  As long as you remain anonymous a malicious internet poster cannot do you actual harm.  Why give one power by responding to powerless taunts?

[Madebymonkeys]

I know nothing of this character in real life...just another desperate delusionary distortion put forward to try to salvage self destroyed credibility.

He/she/it/they have been outed by other members besides me for incessantly preventing the development of many ideas up for discussion, because it is well known that that is how other things are discovered.

This important dialogue process was proven out again yesterday in an experiment conducted by TinMan, inspired by a very persistent Theo, who endured 9 yards of Sh!t flung in his path by the MH entity and his cohorts.

That never would have happened if he had given up in frustration, as so many before him had done.

Facts are facts.

Case proven and rested.

Regards...

*Begin rant...

Hi,

My 2c is that if someone is convinced, rightly or wrongly, that they have something which works, or could work, an anonymous forum username wouldn't stop them....unless that anonymous username makes the original poster realise something which they may have overlooked or made an error with.

There really is no arguing with the fact that there are many people on this forum, and others, who have practically zero electronics skills aside from winding a coil and connecting a light bulb....and using a $5 DMM to take complex measurements which are more suited to another instrument.

Take this forum - If someone were to stop researching something which they were convinced (initially) worked then its likely due to an issue being raised by a forum poster and being validated as an issue (or flawed testing method) by the researcher.
To think that researchers will blindly stop research if some anonymous internet posted says its 'flawed' or 'trash' is wrong...right?
It's difficult for most people to say they f£&ked-up...it's easier for them to say they were 'silenced' even if it does make them sound like a complete tool. Really, there isn't any need silence them, they weren't saying anything useful in the first place!

Also, why on earth would someone be paid to post on this forum? What's to gain?
To this day, nobody has made anything....anything!!! which can be closed-loop OU. That's not down to posters/trolls/whatever, it's down to physics - which is yet to be disproven. I am not saying that it can't be disproven but I am fairly convinced that a coil and some magnets plus a lightbulb (and a $5 DMM) won't do it....ever.

I understand people claim to have OU 'things' but none of them are repeatable and none of them are measured correctly. Please, prove me wrong...and not with a YouTube video either unless you're hot.

So, that's my 2c. In summary, people reply to posts here with what seems like snide comments but these comments are typically from people who know what they are talking about. It can get frustrating when someone claims OU when the reality is that they  don't know anything about validating hardware or measurement methods...both very important.