Lenzless resonant transformer

[Jack Noskills]

I have discovered resonant magnetic flux effect and made a device which I think is electrical version of Tesla's earthquake machine. I can now make a device that is small and powerfull enough to power cellphones and PCs. This level is enough for me, proof of concept. I believe this can be scaled up but I don't want to take all the fun so I am asking you to join the party.


Builder, your job is first to replicate it and then see if it can be scaled up. All details are in the pdf. It falls well in the 'so simple you will laugh' category.


Abstract from the pdf:
'
This short paper describes a simple method how to build a lenzless resonant transformer. Lenz law is not violated but it is used to create more efficient transformer. Without Lenz law this setup could not work.
First some simple tests are presented which forms foundation of the device. Then based on the results of these tests I built the transformer which confirms my test results. It is important to understand the method which will give you understanding. When you understand it you can build it using different components.
'


Have fun and be safe!

[forest]

Jack,


You are genious !     I have though a lot of questions. If I understood the concept the two magnetic currents from both secondary coils will not be pick up by primary if they are exactly equal and opposite in core (I investigate round or C-I core of Fig2). Did you tested it with various loads or it only act that way for one adjusted load ? Did you tested shorted output ? Is that the case of having series resonant circuit at secondary to allow such shorting tests ?
Much more to be digested for me but I'm greatly thankful ! That may be exactly what Don Smith had shown in one video available on youtube !


I have also a hard time understanding how the primary wound on both secondaries would produce AC current of the same phase ?


Note for future : Would that work if  pulsing primary with rectified DC (probably not square wave) to get one direction pulsed magnetic current inside core and the DC output from secondaries !!!? I know that may be distraction at that stage but if you tested all before consider testing this also, because having DC output (2times because two secondaries but many more could be allowed of course) would considerably simplify design, COP would stil be >1 due to Q of primary tank circuit multiplied by amps of many secondaries. Put that open source if you could....


I believe what is needed is the exact coils winding directions and the resulting fluxes by primary and response from secondaries.


Best Regards
Forest

[Jack Noskills]

I had only two halogen light bulbs. I connected one, there was light, and then second bulb which lighted up and first one dimmed just a little. So not enough power to run both at the same time.


I tested shorting, I think it had little effect on primary. I think this is due to the fact that I was not even close to optimum frequency at both sides. I was lucky to get it close enough. When output is shorted without load then all power will be reactive so I guess it is harmless. But don't count on it. There should be no power in the output leads when load is not connected. There is no resonant rise occurring hence no power and no output. Only when output LC-circuit is completed with load resonant rise can occur and with that comes power.


This setup resembles Don's shoe box device which had only NST and metglass C core. Exactly the same kind of coiling at least.


I think DC options would not work. Half wave sine is a sum of multiple frequencies and there has got to be only one. But if you make a successful replication then maybe you can try it. Easiest way to get DC out is to use a diode bridge with smoothing capacitor. I tested with pulse and all I got was a squeaking noise from the core and no output.


Winding directions are in the pdf. If winding is changed it only affects polarity of the coils and you need to connect N poles together and S poles together so that secondary coils repel at output. If this is done wrong then nothing will come out and power circulates in the secondary coils only. If you make a mistake, just reverse one secondary. I have tested both CW-CW and CW-CCW secondary windings and both worked just the same.


Winding direction of primary does not matter.


All is open source and any derivations from this will also be open source. This is why I made a pdf instead of video. Provided that this is the first realization of this device of course I can claim it 'mine' and be authorized to say it is open source. Most likely this is not the first device but I guess we will see.

[d3x0r]

Just thought I'd add a note; parallel coils add like parallel resistance... 1/(L1+L2+...) = 1/(Ltotal)... since L1 and L2 are the same this is the same as 1/L1 + 1/L1 or 2/L1... which when reversed is L1/2 = Ltotal... so parallel will reduce your inductance by half if they are the same... and will always be less than the least inductance...

[DilJalaay]

Well done, good work.
Love to see your actual setup.


D.J