Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



OVERUNITY GENERATOR

Started by magnetman12003, February 03, 2014, 06:30:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

quantumtangles

Your fallacy is that of deliberate misinterpretation. By the word 'you', it is quite clear I mean 'one' or indeed 'any entity by any means'.

Let me be plain. If energy is by any means supplied to a length of copper wire (or indeed to any combination of active or passive electronic components), it is not possible by any means to extract more energy from that piece of copper wire (or from any combination of components, regardless how arcane or complex they may be), than was originally supplied in the first place.

Why do I persist in trying to explain reality. I am not quite sure. Perhaps it is because the very few things of which I can be certain have been certainties earned at great cost and after great effort on my part. Perhaps that is why pseudo-science is so difficult for me to tolerate. On the other hand, perhaps I am part of a global conspiracy engineered by all of the major oil companies in concert so as to prevent the 'truth' about free energy ever being revealed to an increasingly vulnerable and ignorant public...let me think about that last one for a moment............no...sadly thats not true...though I could sure use a pay packet from a major oil company.

It really has become a cult with you people, that is to say, a belief system rather than a matter of scientific analysis. All cults have built in self defence mechanisms (for example that the greatest sin of all, for which there is no forgiveness, is not to believe). The self defence mechanism of the free energy cult is that there is a global conspiracy by oil companies to keep people in the dark about so called free energy.

But let me ask you this. If the major oil companies already know about free energy and have bought up all the patents and silenced all the enigmatrons who invented these great machines, why bother pulling dirty oil out of the ground at great expense? Why not just charge everyone for using their currently secret (yet riproariously well patented) free energy generators?

The answer my dear boy is that free energy is a myth and free energy cultists are uneducated fantasists.

Paul-R

Quote from: quantumtangles on May 25, 2014, 09:45:09 AM


Let me be plain. If energy is by any means supplied to a length of copper wire (or indeed to any combination of active or passive electronic components), it is not possible by any means to extract more energy from that piece of copper wire (or from any combination of components, regardless how arcane or complex they may be), than was originally supplied in the first place.

Please prove that there are no exceptions to this rule of yours.

quantumtangles

Quote from: Paul-R on May 25, 2014, 09:56:24 AM
Please prove that there are no exceptions to this rule of yours.

I suggest I have done so already...referring in this regard to the above equation and its derivative. However, I accept that if Einstein was incorrect concerning E=MC2 (outwith decades of experimental evidence to the contrary), then I am wrong and cannot prove it.

Paul-R

Quote from: quantumtangles on May 25, 2014, 10:01:34 AM
I suggest I have done so already...
When you know ten times more about this subject than you know now, then, like the rest of us, you will acquire the humility to understand that you are on the bottom rung of a ladder with one thousand steps.

At the moment, you are not even on that ladder.

quantumtangles

By the way, if you are the inventor of the Roche hybrid electric engine (his name is Paul), it is an interesting device :) well done.