Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[TinselKoala]

Here, maybe this will help.

[MarkE]

Tom,

TK has omitted the next slide every time he posts that slide.

Of course I reminded him several times of his intentional misleading. Still does it.

.....

Free flow and equalization is the same function - only concentrated in a ZED.

That slide began to explain how we reduce the input - which Mark and the others avoid at all cost.

I am glad they keep bringing it up.

Try as you might Wayne, no amount of misleading language like "reduce the input" can make your fraudulent claims to free energy real.

[TinselKoala]

What do you think.... are you up to it? Or not?



Time is important, after all.... since it has only been a year and a half since honest Wayne Travis admitted he had no desk top self runner and asked other people to build one for him.

[MarkE]

Mark - It is a joke that you keep trying to uninvent our ZED system...

I think we are on to you. Weights bricks, springs, bollard, ---

Which of those get taller as you compress them???

Diversion of desperation..I understand - it is your job.

Only you nose gets longer each time you speak Wayne.  The "ideal ZED" does not get taller as it is compressed.  It gets taller as it relaxes, just like the compression spring it emulates.

[TinselKoala]

Try as you might Wayne, no amount of misleading language like "reduce the input" can make your fraudulent claims to free energy real.

Reduce the input by using the pre-charge. Spring-loaded automatic bollard. Webby finally got it. The precharge isn't used up, it only takes five pounds of lift to raise up a 300 pound bollard or lower it gently, the preload never runs out. You have reduced your input but 'something' has still performed all the work necessary to raise up that heavy bollard.

There is just one problem. What happens when you try to use the motion of the bollard to do work on anything outside the system? Why... the same thing that happens to honest Wayne Travis's buoyancy teetertotter bollard: IT STOPS, and requires more input (flow assist, manual lift, whatever) to move again. And... curiously.... the amount of new input needed is the same as the work that was extracted, plus losses.