Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

MarkE,

Correct your formulas, they are misleading.

Larry your not showing the 50% loss??? - Hasn't that been proven by MarkE Or Tk...
If you don't, someone might figure out that the Zed system does work?
Wait - that would mean all the slander by Tk - may have been intentionally misleading again --
Like the fake mag video he made ----???
Sorry for the poor lighting TK.

[MileHigh]

Can you at least try to take a stab at the answer Wayne?

[TinselKoala]

Larry your not showing the 50% loss??? - Hasn't that been proven by MarkE Or Tk...
If you don't, someone might figure out that the Zed system does work?
Wait - that would mean all the slander by Tk - may have been intentionally misleading again --
Like the fake mag video he made ----???
Sorry for the poor lighting TK.

The quote, bloviating idiot buffoon Honest Wayne Travis, is

"Sorry about the light..."

Stick to selling your fake ZED powerplant, you are hopeless as a standup comic. And don't forget: people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

Yes, your lighting is much better indeed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKWpR0seK0A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSy_33t86gc

It's really too bad your thing won't run overnight, and needs to be precharged, and that you solicited and accepted investments for something that doesn't work as you claimed and never will. So the two situations aren't really as comparable as you think.

[TinselKoala]

Powercat - you've been dooped by the 

Let me tell you now - I have no ill will toward you - even though you have tried to trash my name so many times.
I can not show you what you need to see - but let me assure you - the math tells the truth - no matter who is trying.
Math doesn't care whose side you are on - you have been lied to - by the    manipulating the math to   
It is cheap tricks by the puppet master.

Do you think that covering up your filthy thoughts with little emoticons prevents Someone else from knowing them? My, my, honest Wayne Travis, you are an astounding hypocrite indeed.

I can not show you what you need to see

Fitting words.... will they wind up being your epitaph?

[LarryC]

Pathetic MarkE. It seems that I have to show the proof again and question the deception, because of TK's efforts as master of disillusion.


MarkE,

I told you several times earlier that your formulas shown in your example below wasn't accounting for the Water Head.


Statement below is from this course: Geol 121Hydrology Prof. J Bret Bennington 'A fluid mass has another component of potential energy owing to the pressure of the surrounding fluid acting on it.'


The attached spreadsheet is of a single Archimedes and has the corrected F*ds formulas, an Iterative Integration, and my original Paverage X Volume. All have the same answer except yours.


I added the Iterative Integration as concrete proof that this is correct, as I know you would still think you know better than a PHD in Geology.


Correct your formulas, they are misleading.