Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

I don't blame you for posting comments the have already been answered - I don't take the time to read things that are just for distraction - so much is missed.
Also - it is kid games to try to get me to "show me the sausages" your comment above - that is why I ignore the puppet Minnie.....
I do not care if people believe us or not - the right people do their homework.
p.s. It is four years - and we have not been siting idle at all.....
Let me be clear again -- Our benefactor has first rights to display our Manufactured end model.
We are running a business - preparing to supply the solution to Energy needs.
So what have we been doing for four years........ you will know soon enough.

Ah, now it is the "Manufactured end model".  This is John Rohner all over again with one generation of phony prop after another put before licensees and investors he duped into believing he could make a working plasma engine.  He's been dancing in court with the SEC for a year now.  Tomorrow he is due back in court and faces a very real possibility of being thrown in jail in a civil case.  That is before the DoJ files the criminal charges they have been compiling.

You ahve already admitted that your machines are lossy.  You will never deliver a working free energy device.

[mrwayne]

By definition a lossy system:  Note the word "lossy" loses energy between input and output.  You get less out than you put in.   Your scheme is fundamentally lossy.  How good of your to admit that your contraption is lossy.  Which is an admission that your false claims to energy production are false.Losses cannot be made up in volume Wayne.  You've admitted that you are FoS.

Oh I admit something ... 
So are you saying that if every exchange in a system is lossy that no benefit can be made form the whole system?
What if the input to the system is natural - say like a solar cell or a wind generator?
Hmmmm.... Sure a lot of people confused out in the world...

[MarkE]

Hey TK, Al ect
You are good at assuming .......

I will give you that lol

......................

So why do you assume 600% is absurd....

There are only two ranges of numbers for efficiency:  0 - 100% and undefined.  Were any process able to produce more than it consumes then the process could operate on its own output leaving a surplus that requires no input.  X output divided by zero input is an undefined quotient.  That this escapes you just says more about the limits of your understanding.

Is your education limited to the idea that only conservative systems are allowed to exist?

The First Law of Energy/Matter states that energy/matter is conserved.  It is one of the first principles.  Your patent application will be rejected for lack of utility due to your claims that you violate that first principle.

Take the time to think ....
I can get over 4000 pounds of buoyancy from inside a five gallon bucket - can you?

Weight is not energy.  You know this.  You constantly go on about quantities such as force that are not conserved in your efforts to make a case for your fraudulent free energy claims. 

Oh yeah - that is in an open system - not a hydraulic cylinder lol
.....................
Pressure just over 24 pounds and displacement volume less than 12cubic inches......
Now solve for X -----
X is what you were not taught... and we have been trying to share -
It is the increase in understanding of physics....
.........
We have already given you the tools -

The tools that matter are those that law enforcement has for dealing with crooks like you.  Time will tell if they get applied in your case.

[mrwayne]

Actually your contraption has been disproven mathematically.Support, oh yeah the people who you have conned with your fraud and still don't realize still support you. That population is shrinking.Self-looped running of a free energy machine is something that any working free energy machine should be able to do, and indeed what you make the false claim your contraptions can do.  Anyone can make a mistake in measurement and / or their calculations.  A machine chugging away driving a useful load with no input energy source will eventually deliver more energy than could be stored in its mass or volume by known means.  When a machine delivers well beyond that point it will have evidenced an apparent free energy claim.  It is hilarious that years after promising such demonstrations you now talk them down.  I know why.  You know why.  It is because your claims are bull shit.  It is because your claims have always been bull shit.The people who use their brains here are the ones who spotted you for the fraud that you are a long time ago.

Oh you are Power catt now???
That is a new one on me.

[MarkE]

Oh you are Power catt now???
That is a new one on me.

Put the vodka down Wayne.