Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[TinselKoala]

The "common" char set has lots of interesting things in it. I'm surprised the doublestruck pi didn't display, but the integral sign, the circle with 42 and those did. Weird.

⬕⬚⨖⥉➑✠∯ℵ⁉॰˳˚¿

(just testing)

The "sandwich" is "Biting Through", one of the complete set of 64 I Ching hexagrams included in that character set.

[minnie]

   In 130 pages I don't think we've got further than page one.
      The main lesson learned is that numbers on a page have little
   meaning, the comprehensive diagram and the workings are far
   more important.
        Team Zydro's futile attempts at finding an anomaly are quite
    fascinating, mrwayne himself would probably do better at writing
    novels with his inventive style.
        We really do need something like ZEDs to  provide energy as
    today in parts of the country pollution levels are off the scale.
     This morning you can actually taste the air, it's horrid!
                        John.

[minnie]

   Webby,
   I can be easily won over by a bit of proof.
    Score so far.
    Travis. Nil.
    Red_Sunset. Nil.
    Larry. Nil
    Mondrasek. Nil.
    Webby. Nil.
    Team  Zydro  has got it all to do!
                   John.
       

[Magluvin]

All this, over some pi? 

Mags

[mrwayne]

Wrong John,, team skeptic's attempts to hide those anomalies is falling apart fairly fast.

I don't know Tom,
What good does it do to discover a free energy device?

Last year I thought these skeptics were just not qualified to evaluate -
I mean according to them;
all the most devious and brilliant brainwashing master minds of all time rolled into one character - is here wasting his time not asking for money and not applying for an OU prize............(That's brilliant)...

According to the phony skeptics - everyone who has hands on experience is a babbling shill and too stupid to think for themselves....give me a break.......................

This is Mondrasek's link - and his point was to show the an Ideal ZED has an anomaly - not even the whole process - and we have 130 pages of every diversion possible to deny what is clearly just .......cool.

A skeptic does not direct the observation to his will - he/she reports the facts.

Wayne