Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[minnie]

   mrwayne,
                 please read what you write before posting. Most of your answers don't make
   proper  sense.
                      John.

[minnie]

   mrwayne,
                please show us the anomaly concerns that plague MarkE. I'm sure if there
    is something wrong he'll put it right straight away.
                                            John.

[powercat]

Now you compounded your lie - Mark has found a minor error in Mikes math, and made several minor errors himself - in discussing Mikes Ideal analysis - he has agreed that losses exist in our system.

We never claimed loss less system???

To be clear - In a super conservative system - one that produces enough net to overcome all losses - the presumption and imposed idea that if any losses exist - than nothing cam be gained....is intellectual immaturity.

We had to face that anomaly in our study of our system.

"If" mark ever discusses the whole process - then I will be impressed.

Next point - whom is wasting who's time......

Good day

Have re posted Wayne's quote again with a few minor alterations.
=================================================
Quote from: mrwayne on April 04, 2014, 03:33:09 PM
Now you compounded my lie - Mark has found a major error in Mikes math, but made no errors himself - in discussing Mikes Ideal analysis - he has agreed that losses are continuously found in our system.

We claimed loss less system???

To be clear - In a super inefficient system - one that produces not enough net to overcome all losses - the presumption and imposed idea that if any losses exist - than nothing cam be gained....is intellectually accurate in this case.

We had to face no anomaly in our study of our fraudulent system.

Mark discusses the whole process - I am impressed.

Next point - whom is wasting who's time......We have no working device - verification will never happen - I always tell the truth

Good day
==================================================================================

[MarkE]

Hey missed you...
I am sure it was an accident - but your quote left out the production - Mark does it on purpose -
Notice the term "second" these two actions - the load - which is the output of a ZED and the Stored potential - are two separate things. One is converted to energy for the customer - and the other is transferred - but not consumed - in a SUPER CONSERVATIVE PROCESS - that reduces the total production cost - of the energy to the customer - by more than 50%.
Not yelling - just being clear -
Here is the that post section in full:
"And by the way - the second energy transfer function only needed to cover the lossy system expenses to run closed loop.

Let me break that down - if the first Energy transfer was "only" 50% efficient - the whole system would have still been 100% efficient....... In the ZED - two separate things happen in a ZED - Potential and the stroke of a load.

The potential created to lift the load is then used to reduce the cost of the next load..... simple as is simple does.


A big P.S. The first energy transfer function - the load - was supplemented by the other Zeds Second Energy transfer function."
Thanks for clearing that up.

The fraud Wayne Travis speaks.  There is no net energy production from your contraption versus input.  Your junk pile is a net energy consumer.  BTW:  I just love the your invented terms.

[MarkE]

Ok " Chosen One " sorry if asking you to defend your lies is not fun.
...............
OK MarkE, you have had two days
To admit the first anomaly - and you failed.
As is your method - your defended your "paradox claim" - even posted a picture of a buoyant object - void of any layers ........ layers which lay waste to your denial.
..................
You have had one day to admit Anomaly Number Two:
Remember when you claimed it was categorically lossy to add systems together - sorry that you proved yourself wrong in the spread sheets - most people call the learning - but do you have the character to admit that anomaly..

You didn't bother to respond - other than cry baby about me being your fraud 
..............................

Lets go to Anomaly Number Three:
Our system does not consume the pressure * volume used to precharge or stroke - now here is the kicker - while doing work....
Name me another system that produces separate work and conserves the input........ here is a tip - Super conservative might not be in your text book....... the ZED is an anomaly.
Now why can't you suppress the ZED system? ??
I don't think you have "missed it" like you act -- I gave you the benefit while many others wrote you off - You are fooling many..
Have a good day.

Your junk piles do not exhibit any anomalies.  No matter how much you insist, there is nothing behind your tattered curtain.  You're a con artist with a Bible.