Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Should anyone ever discover a means to break the conservative nature of gravity, they would not need new terms to describe what they would have found.  We already have appropriate terminology.  What would require explanation are the circumstances under which non conservative behavior can be observed.  So, no there is no: "he of course must throw in newly minted terms".

The fraud: Wayne Travis freely engages in nonsense baffle gab.  An obvious motive is to confuse naive and uneducated audience members.  He presents behaviors that have been well understood and exploited for multiple millennia as things he claims to have discovered.  He's a liar, and not a very good one at that.

Really, MarkE... for what benefit - you and the Trolls are the most blinded by prejudiced people I have ever meet in my life....
Almost everyone of our visiting Engineers had the same prejudice - and not one single engineer was "unable to cope with the facts"
How possible does it hurt anyone to share my discovery???
Are you the conservative Law police?
Let me remind you - the Law was written by men using sound judgment, science, and mathematics..... and it has evolved over and over as new discoveries have been made.
You are blessed to have been given the opportunity to share in the release of our Super conservative process..
And you treat the discovery and those that understand it with Trolling Buffoonery
Worst of all you make up crap to make yourself confident....
I care less if you like my words -
You should thank me for putting up with you and the puppets  attacks.....
WHO IS HURTING YOU OR ANYONE ELSE
You fain that you are some hero trying to help innocent people from a fraud.... a portrait you painted...
You attack the innocent constantly - look in the mirror - that is what makes you a Troll.
................
More importantly:
Prove your accusations...
How much of the input energy is still in the system after the Stroke and external load has been removed and the ZED not allowed to pop up?
Let me help you - how much energy was wasted when you popped up...??
That's right - most of it...
Now what is most important next step --- remove more energy to be able to sink...
OR REUSES ALL THAT ENERGY TO REDUCE THE OTHER ZED........
Now quick math - how much would have to be reused to make the other ZED SUPER CONSERVATIVE???
You would have capture enough to over come the losses in the transfer.... right?
Well would 50% be enough.... well it would if the ZEDs Ideal was only 50% efficient...
GEE, if we only were able to recapture 50% of the input, and were only able to design a buoyancy system that was 50% efficient - we could make unity....
But what if we could make a buoyancy device that is 51% efficient - or how about 99.9%
Or what if we could capture 51% of the reuse - or how about 75% of it??
........SUPER CONSERVATIVE APTLY DESCRIBES THE ABILITY TO USE AN INPUT MORE THAN ONCE...........
<<<AND THE CURRENT LAWS OF PHYSICS EXPLAINS THAT THE RESULT IS NET ENERGY>>>
It is so simple it boggles my mind that you can not get it.
Wayne

[TinselKoala]

Really, Honest Wayne?

For our international readers, it is now 6:43 am in Chickasha OK USA, and it appears that honest Wayne Travis has gotten up early and made at least SIX forum posts arguing with internet trolls he does not respect.... BEFORE BREAKFAST.


The fellow has a serious problem.

[mrwayne]

Now MarkE
I am receiving E-mails explaining that you are willfully ignorant...
Why waste my time with a unapologetic liar?
Let me tell you and all why -------------------
Free energy, clean energy, energy security, and energy independence - is far more important than your Ego, and my time.
Show where anyone has ever proven the ZED technology wrong -
You can't because MATH DOES NOT CARE ABOUT your vendetta.
Show it here now....my system - not the one you tired to invent with the weights going up and down, or the springs, or the dolls, or the unloaded system, or the bricks, or the unicorns....
Actually show that a ZED does not work.... You can not because you and the gang of four are just not powerful enough to change the physics...
Yeah - our system improves the understanding of physics -
That is why we get so much good help - first - we are not jerks to other people - second - we have the physical truth - and you have personal attacks..
and one more thing you need - admit when you are wrong - it builds character.

[TinselKoala]

Make that SEVEN !!

[TinselKoala]

Now MarkE
I am receiving E-mails explaining that you are willfully ignorant...
Why waste my time with a unapologetic liar?
Let me tell you and all why -------------------
Free energy, clean energy, energy security, and energy independence - is far more important than your Ego, and my time.
Show where anyone has ever proven the ZED technology wrong -
You can't because MATH DOES NOT CARE ABOUT your vendetta.
Show it here now....my system - not the one you tired to invent with the weights going up and down, or the springs, or the dolls, or the unloaded system, or the bricks, or the unicorns....
Actually show that a ZED does not work.... You can not because you and the gang of four are just not powerful enough to change the physics...
Yeah - our system improves the understanding of physics -
That is why we get so much good help - first - we are not jerks to other people - second - we have the physical truth - and you have personal attacks..
and one more thing you need - admit when you are wrong - it builds character.

You still don't seem to get it, honest Wayne Travis.

YOU ARE MAKING THE CLAIMS. IT IS UP TO YOU TO PROVE THEM.  It is not the responsibility of any one else to "disprove" them. Your claims are implausible and contrary to physics therefore they are FALSE until there is EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY... and it is ALWAYS the claimant's responsibility to provide the evidence.

Don't believe me? ASK YOUR LAWYERS what "habeas corpus" means.