Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Really, you stick with that one...
p.s. So you do not confuse people more with that diversion - we do not alter gravity - as we have said many many times..... As RED SUNSET explained many times - We alter the process during different orientations......
Makes using Gravity as an energy source possible...
Thanks

Of course you don't alter the conservative nature of gravity Wayne.  You just lie about that on your website claiming that you do. 

[MarkE]

DITO...

Having trouble reading your own posts Wayne?

[MarkE]

MarkE,
If you are not going to admit you are wrong - stop being a liar on this thread and bug off.
Your diversion tactics will no longer be tolerated.
Tom is right - "any" reasonable person can see the obvious facts here - one - that the energy is still in the Zed and could be recycled... Hence my term "Super Conservative" fits nicely.
And two: that you are a fraud - refusing to accept your own Math....
P.s. Our team - is awesome...

Ah, more verbal effluent from the fraud : Wayne Travis.  LOL, just make up any old story and see who is stupid enough to believe it.

Tom can't find his way out of that wet paper bag he trapped himself in long ago.

Anyone who believes that one can net energy out cyclically raising and lowering weights is a moron.

[MarkE]

I did Mark, and you are making a false claim.

You are also still avoiding the simple question of how much of the input volume and pressure is left after the lift of a real ZED.

LOL.  You are so lost Tom.  You are free to perform an energy balance you think is favorable anytime.  You're efforts over the past month to dispute the R4 spreadsheet have been a complete failure.

[MarkE]

Useless wall of text.

Any working professional who actually believed that they were witness to a break through in science would be happy to associate themselves with such a discovery.  But for the Travis cadre there is no discovery.  There is a carnival barker act.