Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Ummm.... fossil fuels do not exist, and never have existed.  This misnomer was disproved many, many years ago when I was a geology major in college.  Oil does not come from decomposing dinosaurs.  It is a natural by product of the chemistry inside the earth's core and is not a "finite" resource.  If you are not up to speed on this, then I question everything else that you are claiming.  Of course, after watching your first videos and after mark Dansie's visit, I was already questioning your unsubstantiated claims.  Now it seems that the math is not on your side.  Nor is general laws of physics.  Now may be a good time to get into another racket.

Bill

Hello Pirate,

Don't fall for the "Math is not on our side claim" -

Mark E never presented our process - only a static evaluation and conclusions.

Larry has presented a mathematical representation of our whole process, he showed how one layer is less than 70% effecient - and that three layers in a dual recycling system - as designed to operate - provides Net energy.

He also provide the basis to understand that Buoyancy - in standard utilization is very inefficient.... but when layered - can rival a hydraulic cylinder action - and retain the Pv - which can be reused.

MarkE earned my thanks when he helped recognize and correct errors - awesome.

MarkE did not disprove our operation or system - only says he has.

I detailed the process - there is no excuse for the misleading - it has been common.

Thanks

Wayne
   

[Magluvin]

I was originally invited to share our discovery.

Several members assumed - I must be this or that...

That's all there is to any of that.

I took time from my work to return because several men who built systems and tested our claims - asked to give O/U.com one more chance.

If I must have a motive other than respecting hard work and Due diligence - it is to let other inventors know - the oppression that a few here on this web site poor out daily - has no real value.

Keep researching, keep discovering, keep asking the questions.

That is what leads to the advancement of real discovery.

Wayne

Hey Wayne

Long time since we chatted last.

My post was a bit of sarcasm.    I KNOW that you have not asked for any investments from anyone here. I was just fishing for some clear reasons for the comments.

Webby and Larry and who ever else is doing work on this, its too bad there is more negative posts than they care to be bothered with. I would be very frustrated. Its not like they asked for help from these guys. I guess it just the way things are today. People dont like people doing their own thing and need to occupy their time with page after page of argument. No wonder nothing gets done around here.

I guess Mark was exclaiming that why give away the idea if there is an investor. Wouldnt the investor disapprove?  I cant answer that for him.

Anyway, hope things work out for the builders. its not a simple task.

Mags

[MileHigh]

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."  - Edmund Burke

Those are very wise words that everyone should seriously contemplate.

[Magluvin]

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."  - Edmund Burke

Those are very wise words that everyone should seriously contemplate.

[MarkE]

I was originally invited to share our discovery.

Several members assumed - I must be this or that...

That's all there is to any of that.

I took time from my work to return because several men who built systems and tested our claims - asked to give O/U.com one more chance.

If I must have a motive other than respecting hard work and Due diligence - it is to let other inventors know - the oppression that a few here on this web site pour out daily - has no real value.

Keep researching, keep discovering, keep asking the questions.

That is what leads to the advancement of real discovery.

Wayne

That's funny because you have no discovery.  You make claims to discoveries that do not exist.  You have not discovered a means to extract free energy by cyclically lifting and dropping weights.  Yet, you continue to insist that you do.  You have not discovered a way to make gravity behave non-conservatively.  Yet, you continue to insist that you do.  You have not discovered a "mechanical energy amplifying system".  Neither do have any means to produce "supply endless and abundant clean Energy".  Those are just blatant lies you tell in search of a buck.  Does Jesus approve of such behavior?