Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mrwayne]

Demonstrate it, then. You cannot.
Show us your electric bills. You will not.
Your words mean nothing, against the lack of a practical demonstration of your claims. Just think how easy it would be for you to refute me utterly, had you what you claim. But you have not, and you cannot, because you DO NOT. Go ahead, prove me wrong by showing a valid demonstration.

I'm holding my breath in anticipation.....











NOT.

Good thing Sock Puppets don't breath...

Lets get something clear -

You set the standard making claims against our ZED device using supposed indisputable mathematical proof.

Now you refuse to accept  that same method as proof. you speak out of both socks at the same time...

The question at hand - no pun intended - is Mathematical analysis - if you are not interested - put the boys back in the dresser.

Your diversion is a waste of time.

Wayne

[mrwayne]

If he really is a PE, then he can be sued by any and all of the burned investors for his expressed support of HER/Zydro's false claims.

Once again - Our system is real - you are making a fool of yourself.

How hard is your apology going to come......that is if you have an honor.

You should really look at the spreadsheets Monderask and Larry shared - ask for their help if you do not understand.

Wayne

[MarkE]

Mark,

I m sill holding out that you will actually look, threats and slander ignored.

The Word Conservative is a theory - and Non conservative - does not have to ask its permission.

Conservative does not need your protection - Math supports and proves both.

This does not require higher math to understand or verify.

Larry and Mark have presented proof - and it can be utilized in a ZED system.

Good luck.

Wayne Travis it is not slander to state the fact that you are making false claims of among other things:  A way to get non conservative behavior from gravity, free energy from cyclically lifting and dropping weights.  The threat to you is from burned investors who have believed your false and reckless statements.  They can sue.  If there are enough of them with any influence they can bring law enforcement against you as well.  You claim to have many legal groups.  Have them look into the Acts:  1933, and 1934.  See what they have to say about selling securities while making fraudulent statements. 

The conservative nature of gravitational fields is an extremely well observed fact.  If you wish to counter that you go up against known science at least back to Kepler and arguably back to the Greeks.  The burden of proof is upon you.  You haven't a shred of evidence, much less proof.  That makes your false claims at a minimum reckless.

Larry has yet to prove anything, ditto Mark, and most of all:  ditto you.

[mrwayne]

Then why hasn't it been? Why are you not running your house, shop, and Trinity Baptist Church on the wonderful output of your Zed system?

I know why, and so do you.

Let me help you TK - you can't prove our system is anything less than we claim....

End of story.

Good Day - I have a meeting.

[MarkE]

Once again - Our system is real - you are making a fool of yourself.

How hard is your apology going to come......that is if you have an honor.

You should really look at the spreadsheets Monderask and Larry shared - ask for their help if you do not understand.

Wayne

Your system does not produce the free energy that you claim.  We know it doesn't even give an appearance of something interesting because you have never lived up to the years over due Dansie demonstration.  You can bluff and bluster all day long.  The fact that you don't demonstrate underlies the simple fact that you can't demonstrate.

It is just amazing to see how persistently you repeat your suggestions that there is some magic behind your tattered curtains.  There isn't.