Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

mondrasek

MarkE, you introduced a rate into an Energy calculation.  Rate does not apply when calculating the Energy leaving the system as the piston rises in this case. 

The correct Energy = F*ds reduction for the case of the riser lifting the water on top of the piston is simply Fave*S.

The Force starts at the maximum buoyancy Force that can be calculated from State 2.  It then declines linearly to exactly zero which is the case in State 3 since the water is flowing off of the piston as it is rising.  This is a straight forward calculation and involves no rates.

MarkE

Quote from: mondrasek on March 06, 2014, 01:38:04 PM
No, MarkE.  And after checking, I think we need to return to your "correction" to post #667.  There you introduced a "rate" into that Energy equation.  You will need to explain that.
Do you or do you not understand how to integrate in order to obtain energy?

MarkE

Quote from: webby1 on March 06, 2014, 02:31:55 PM
Not to sound to silly,, but would that then suck the water up AR6 and over into AR5?
No, opening the pod chamber would allow water to flow back from AR6 into AR7.  It's just a collapsing balloon. 

TinselKoala

Don't forget that the atmosphere outside the system is pushing with a constant pressure. Nothing the apparatus does can affect this pressure. The outer surface area of course changes, the volume that displaces air outside changes, and there IS measurable "air buoyancy" from the displaced outer air.... but the outer air is not an "ideal gas" in the sense that the apparatus cannot store energy in the outer air, nor extract energy from it. This is because changes in the apparatus volume do not cause changes in the pressure of the outside air. And if the inner fluids of the apparatus are incompressible, then also changes in the outside air pressure do not cause changes in the apparatus volume. By having two incompressible fluids in your apparatus you have killed all chances of taking advantage of the Cartesian Diver effect, and also the submarine's manner of altering  buoyancy by pumping compressed air into and out of tanks to empty and fill them with water.

So.... how are you going to "turn buoyancy on and off"?

mondrasek

Quote from: MarkE on March 06, 2014, 02:38:21 PM
Do you or do you not understand how to integrate in order to obtain energy?

MarkE, we appear to have cross posted.  Please see my post previous to yours.