Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

Started by mondrasek, February 13, 2014, 09:17:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

minnie




  Webby,
         I asked Wayne if he had a self running 5 hp machine.
   His answer was  "I'm confused"
    All I wanted was a Yes/no answer, no waffle.
                    John.

mondrasek

Quote from: MarkE on March 06, 2014, 07:54:01 PM
So you get a movement S = FSTART/KRATE 0.30078N / 64.649N/m =  0.004653m and an output energy of
0.5*0.30078N*0.004653m   0.700mJ.

MarkE, thank you so much for all your hard work!  I think it must be in this last step that I have made my mistake.  I'm looking at it now, but found a discrepancy between our work.  It might be a small miss on your part, or I am making another mistake, so I wanted to clarify.

I am finding the riser in the no-pod, single riser example at State 2 to be displacing 35.6234 cm3 of water and should therefore have an FSTART = 0.34884N.  Can you please clarify if I am missing a step?

mondrasek

Quote from: MarkE on March 06, 2014, 07:54:01 PM
The energy expended, is the loss of potential energy in the annular columns as they move from the State 2 condition to the State 3 condition with the riser at 2.492mm lift...

Okay, I am lost here.  The lift was 4.68536mm.  Did I miss something?

Or 4.653mm by your math.  Probably due to the use of different constants for water density and gravity?

minnie




    mrwayne's  on to something," you push it down and it goes up".
    Quite amazing!
                       John.

TinselKoala

Quote from: MileHigh on March 07, 2014, 10:18:49 AM
I thought the forward voltage drop for an ordinary red LED was 0.6 volts and I was wrong.  In the past, I have calculated the current programming resistor values for when an LED is connected to a 5-volt source and a 12-volt source.  That's a huge challenge for the average experimenter on the forums.  I think the last time I had to worry about LEDs was in 1988 when I had to put a few indicator lights on the front panel of a VMEbus controller card that I was designing.

MileHigh

You probably thought you had discovered Free Energy when the LEDs were much brighter than you expected!

Here's how I do it:
V=IR, so R=V/I
R = (Vsupply - Vfwd)/ILED

ETA: I've just been testing and identifying a bunch of random Zener diodes that have unreadable or mysterious markings. Any guesses as to how I'm doing it?