Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[mondrasek]

This clever from a transfer function matching stand point bit is quite telling:  Using your "ideal ZED" dimensions it requires a 271.5mm dia x 2.591 mm high pool of water on top of the original ~50mm dia 67mm assembly height.  This large flaky machine is capable of cycling 0.0019J each cycle by storing water in a 2.59mm pan and then pushing the water over the top lip of the pan.  We have established that the process is not only fundamentally lossy, but from any practical standpoint, it is also completely ridiculous.

MarkE, please show some respect.  My post was clearly addressed to @powercat.  I would appreciate if you would not respond to, and therefore possibly bury, posts intended for someone other than yourself.

[MarkE]

Ah there you go again, constructing men of straw so that you may charge and slay them.  Anyone who has given Wayne Travis money for his fraudulent free energy claims is gullible.  If you have cash to spare there are opportunities in:  Very fast growing bean stalks, high toll opportunity thoroughfares in certain midAtlantic states, ocean front land in Florida,  security cases loaded with cash in Amsterdam, and  free energy machines in Chickasha OK.


You are making an assumption that they are gullible but in fact you are NOT in communication with them, correct?

You are wrong yet again.  It's fun to see you yap away trying to promote Wayne Travis' fraud.

A non answer will be taken as a confirmation.

LOL.

If I am building men of straw, well at least they are something REAL and not assumed and can be verified before I go and slay them.

A straw man is by definition an invented opposing argument.  As the guy who keeps claiming to have built a mechanism that he cannot describe you might want to be more cautious about emphasizing the term:  "REAL".

Can you say the same?  No you can not.

There you go:  When reality doesn't suit you, then just make stuff up like your master Wayne.

Wayne gave dates as to when he was going to try and provide more information and verification, several times, and was not able to meet these dates.

Of course Wayne Travis could never make his dates:  His claims are fraudulent.  Wayne Travis has known all along that his claims are lies.  It is just so funny to see you constantly rush to the defense of the fraud Wayne Travis.

Regardless of the reasons, this is the only thing that you have built your whole attack on, someone NOT meeting a schedule.

I was not aware of some cosmic contest.  Since when is it necessary or even appropriate for anyone who points out a fraud to build some other device or devices?  What should those other devices do?

Your opinion and your analysis is that the system can not work, those are not absolutes and are subject to error.

It is a fact that Wayne Travis' claims that he can generate free energy are false.  Again it is very funny to watch you go into full attack mode trying to defend a guy who has been stealing money from gullible investors.  Why do you not only support Wayne Travis' fraud, but support it so vociferously?

[MarkE]

No answer yet again MarkE.

The real question is why you do not answer the questions but defer to some other response.

There it is:  More idle attack.  You do understand how completely you have put your stripes on full display don't you Tom?

[MarkE]

MarkE, please show some respect.  My post was clearly addressed to @powercat.  I would appreciate if you would not respond to, and therefore possibly bury, posts intended for someone other than yourself.

Mondrasek, I pointed out various aspects of the subject you brought up that are pertinent.  If you want to hold a private conversation PM gives you a way to do that. 

Now, getting back to this mechanism that you brought up in the single riser example:  If the pan were only 28mm as shown, it would only transfer about 7.5% of the work input each cycle, IE lose about 92.5% of the input each cycle.  If you think that is significantly off, then you are free to show calculations that generate a significantly different result.

[MarkE]

More responses with lots of words without saying anything.

You make a statement of "fact" and I question those actual "facts",, no stripes there.

You did not answer the force of opposition question, I would of thought that an easy one, except it does not support your usage of that condition.

That all by itself seems to make it you that are the one wearing stripes for all to see.

You can yap away all you want Tom.  It will not make any of: Wayne Travis' / HER / Zydros fraudulent claims either true or innocent.  Why do support Wayne Travis' fraud?  And why do support it so vociferously?  What's in it for you to motivate such strong support for this fraud?