Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[powercat]

Here is just one page from webby previous posts,
http://www.overunity.com/profile/webby1.1117/area/showposts/start/480/#.UzCODvl_s8A
for those nonmembers who can't use the link, the thread is about a self looping "SMOT" and nothing to do with the ZED, they are many more pages like this showing a lack of interest in the ZED from the time Wayne originally left the forum.

You can also see that since Wayne returned webby only ever posts about the ZED, and must post almost every day for months, and he must challenge almost everything told to him, and despite being capable of building a device, he insists on repetitive argumentative posting.

[MarkE]

What are you asking?

LOL, you posed a question.  If you can't supply the context for your question then you are totally lost.

[MarkE]

Here is just one page from webby previous posts,
http://www.overunity.com/profile/webby1.1117/area/showposts/start/480/#.UzCODvl_s8A
for those nonmembers who can't use the link, the thread is about a self looping "SMOT" and nothing to do with the ZED, they are many more pages like this showing a lack of interest in the ZED from the time Wayne originally left the forum.

You can also see that since Wayne returned webby only ever posts about the ZED, and must post almost every day for months, and he must challenge almost everything told to him, and despite being capable of building a device, he insists on repetitive argumentative posting.

If Webby believes that a SMOT can be made to complete a full cycle without added external energy, then there is a good chance that he does not understand things like fields and integrals.

[MarkE]

Well,, why don't you show that you are no different.

Posting the same argument over and over, is indeed repetitive.

I agreed to disagree many times and was fine with the impasse.

But the "tyranny of it all" seems to be ever present even tho that is not the only way nature works.

Tom, if you think that the N*(X/N)² tyranny of equalizing (full equalization is not necessary) two potential energy stores does not apply to your two cylinder lifter machine, then go after it.  You have many times claimed that your  two cylinder lifter had been designed and constructed in such a way that it was not subject to the problem.  Yet months later, you have been unable to show that you have been doing anything but blowing smoke.

In the meantime, it is your personal choice to actively support Wayne Travis' fraud.  It's your reputation that you stain by doing that.

[MarkE]

Which question would that be?

Now you act as though you can't even remember your own questions.  They must not be important to you.  If your questions aren't important enough for you to remember, then why should they be important enough to anyone else to answer?