Mathematical Analysis of an Ideal ZED

[MarkE]

Here is your proof that you need to control yourself Mark,, increase your meds.

Don't think so Mark,, I started out with a device that did all that BEFORE you brought it up,, kind like you followed me on that one,, AND NO the pump does not get in the way,, what a pathetic move on your part there MarkE,, OF COURSE the pump is in the middle,, AND the pump can move two DIFFERENT volumes of WATER at 2 DIFFERENT rates. Just in case you don't understand that it is called a "lever" function.

MarkE,, it is you who have buried yourself,,

Sure Tom, whenever you get it worked out, just show the diagrams and the data.  Maybe you can find that missing notebook. 

[MarkE]

Here is a pic of a simple little testbed I built a year or two ago.

That is about a 12ft tall head pipe coming out of the pump,, that would be 12ft above the top of the pump.

No reciprocating parts inside the pump.

This is one of many testbeds I built for this pump method.

Question 1)  What it the head pressure coming out of the pump as the pump moves water all the way up the head pipe.

Question 2)  What modification did I make that increased the efficiency of this style pump.

Bonus points)  What did I call this pump.

That's a lovely shed Tom.  What's it got to do with your prior claims?

[powercat]

@ webby1
You are clearly capable of construction, but like the rest of the Wayne Travesty supporters you don't have a self-running device, so you can't prove your claim, and conventional science wins again, you're all a bunch of losers, and fraudsters for claiming something which is clearly not true, and proven by the lack of anyone in all these years coming up with a self-running device.

Even Wayne himself admits it

I can not show you what you need to see

[minnie]

   Webby,
            1,  About 5 psi.
            2,   Optimise ratio input/output.
            3,   Webby single stage diaphragm pump.
             Nice work Webby.
                              John.

[mrwayne]

@ webby1
You are clearly capable of construction, but like the rest of the Wayne Travesty supporters you don't have a self-running device, so you can't prove your claim, and conventional science wins again, you're all a bunch of losers, and fraudsters for claiming something which is clearly not true, and proven by the lack of anyone in all these years coming up with a self-running device.

Even Wayne himself admits it

PC - your going backwards - in maturity

So what does a self running device prove that an increase output over input does not?
Can any video ever prove anything? - No - it just fuels stupid insults - well like yours....
So ignoring that we have already provided video of a self running ZED....
What will you need to see then???
That's right - the "math" to support the claim - .......... WE have provided that.